This guy is obviously a tool, to be in a situation where you end up at trial charged with rape, shows something fishy happened. But the guy was found 'not guilty'. Maybe it's not the same as innocent, but it's also not the same as guilty.
The guy should be allowed to carry on with his life as he sees fit, and NZC should pick him if they think he'll play a role in the side.
As I said before Makhaya Ntini is a good example. Ntini was found guilty of rape, and he appealed the verdict. Rightly, while this was going on he wasn't picked for SA, and if I remember right, he was dropped from the 1999 WC squad and replaced by Roger Telemachus. On appeal he was subsequently found not guilty. He went on to have a full career for SA and is one of SA's greatest fast bowlers, and was also the first black person to play for SA. I'm not saying Kuggelein (sp?) is like that, but Ntini had the chance to have a full international career after what he did (even after initially being found guilty!) and this Kiwi fellow should have the same opportunity.
I have not followed this case closely, but it does seem that Kuggelein doesn't treat women properly and seems to think he's entitled to them etc. But if that was a disqualification from playing top cricket, say goodbye to Chris Gayle, Herschelle Gibbs, Shane Warne, Ian Botham etc.