• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** South Africa in New Zealand 2017

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
Really need Jimmy to make a score here. With Rossco unlikely to bat we're gonna need 400 to win this match.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
Brutal luck for NZ. Two seasons in a row that Taylor has been unavailable for the the showpiece test series.
 

Meridio

International Regular
SA started well this morning, no free runs on offer - nothing on KW's pads, it's all just outside off stump.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Ha, very very lucky Neesham

Edit: Or is he? Radio comms aren't sure, though Malcolm Jordan still says it's a no ball.
 
Last edited:

vandem

State Captain
I thought you had to ground part of your boot behind the line?

Edit, think I misunderstood the rule, appears that they look at the position of the foot when the initial contact with the ground is made, and is OK if heel is in the air but slightly behind "the imaginary line extending upwards from the back of the painted line". So may or may not have been a no ball (TV freeze-frame is ambiguous), but not enough evidence for 3rd ump to reverse the on-field decision.
 
Last edited:

SeamUp

International Coach
It looked a no ball but one angle shows toe/point of first contact, that the heel may be behind the line in the air ?

Neesham got real working over.
 

SeamUp

International Coach
Not long ago it looked like Morkel wouldn't add to 242 test wickets so quite a big moment for him.
 

Meridio

International Regular
Think we've been a bit too passive this morning - while I certainly don't want to jump on the #intent bandwagon, we've just let SA bowl where they want to. Building up a lot of pressure on ourselves, such that when we do have something slightly loose, we're missing out on runs.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
I haven't seen it, but cricinfo says this, which I'm sure is nonsense as I've never heard of Umpire's Call on no-ball.

Because this wasn't called no-ball by the third umpire, the decision was upheld. If Dharmasena called it on the field, third umpire would have surely given it not-out because he wouldn't have anything conclusive to suggest it wasn't one.
That's not how it's ever worked before, right?
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
Taylor update: Low grade tear in right calf. Could return to bat if needed. Not yet sure of his status for the rest of the series
 

Neil Young

State Vice-Captain
It looked a no ball but one angle shows toe/point of first contact, that the heel may be behind the line in the air ?

Neesham got real working over.
Nah, he didn't. He comfortably left most he faced. Should have played his natural game, mind.
 

Top