honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Warne
I'd say Warne is ahead of Hogg by a very comfortable margin. I'm sure his ODI career gets overrated by some but putting him 'marginally' ahead of Hogg seems to be going to the other extreme. He was generally among the best bowlers of his day and there was a good period in the mid 1990s where he was arguably the best.Pfft, what if I want two spinners?
Anyway Warne marginally over Hogg I suppose, even though Warne is a very overrated ODI bowler, but he was great in the '99 semi, I'll give him that.
If you don't want to take this seriously that's fine but I'd prefer it if people did. Want these teams to be genuine and accurate as a depiction of CW's greatest ODI sides.O'Keefe 3- Warne 3. Let's do this, CW.
~ Hillary being condescending to Trump supporters ~If you don't want to take this seriously that's fine but I'd prefer it if people did. Want these teams to be genuine and accurate as a depiction of CW's greatest ODI sides.
huh?~ Hillary being condescending to Trump supporters ~
Wait, does that make us Trump supporters??
I wanted Symonds and Watson at 6 and 7So at present we have :
Ponting - 23
Bevan - 13
Hussey -13
Jones - 13
Considering we have Gilchrist batting in the top six we can carry on from here if everyone is happy, and our top six will be locked. A number of people indicated they wanted Bevan at 6 anyhow. Will mean the #7 will be able to carry a bowling load, or share it with M.Waugh at least.