Mike5181
International Captain
Ellyse Perry > W.G. Grace confirmed.Nah mate. Have you seen the clips of Ranji and Grace on youtube? The women are way above that standard.
Ellyse Perry > W.G. Grace confirmed.Nah mate. Have you seen the clips of Ranji and Grace on youtube? The women are way above that standard.
The offies who did that took all the wickets. ****ing talentless ****s.Amelia Kerr's bowling reminds me of the kid in under-12s who decided to bowl leg spin and bowled it so loopy and slow that if the batsman missed it they can turn back around have another crack at it, literally.
Well, yeah we want the game to be expanding in to new and different markets as much as possibleIt is now 'political correct' to gush admirably over the female game, to cite ''how far it has progressed'' and ''how it is getting girls interested in cricket''. Just saying!
It's great if that's the case. More people playing is always better.It is now 'political correct' to gush admirably over the female game, to cite ''how far it has progressed'' and ''how it is getting girls interested in cricket''. Just saying!
So bad, she's good?Amelia Kerr's bowling reminds me of the kid in under-12s who decided to bowl leg spin and bowled it so loopy and slow that if the batsman missed it they can turn back around have another crack at it, literally.
She was close to under-12s in that video footage tbf, 14 as the video says. Was a tiny less loopy in the T20 the other night at age 16.Amelia Kerr's bowling reminds me of the kid in under-12s who decided to bowl leg spin and bowled it so loopy and slow that if the batsman missed it they can turn back around have another crack at it, literally.
You accused me of speaking rubbish about players concentrating on Slams, yet when I produce evidence of players concentrating on Slams you completely avoid the argument! I was correct and you were incorrect. At least admit it.
I did not say anything. I was paraphrasing punditry - something you ignore. You conveniently continue to further ignore the fact that the Slam priority is a well known discussion in tennis circles, in order to make it seem as if I have invented a completely novel (and incorrect) discussion to discredit me personally. I have already provided two sources which proves this is not so - both dismissed flippantly.You said they only play the slams. Totally wrong as has been proven multiple times. If you want to keep embarrassing yourself by all means continue. I'll continue ridiculing you.
wtf does whether or not they only play slams/focus on slams have to do with it anyway?I did not say anything. I was paraphrasing punditry - something you ignore. You conveniently continue to further ignore the fact that the Slam priority is a well known discussion in tennis circles, in order to make it seem as if I have invented a completely novel (and incorrect) discussion to discredit me personally. I have already provided two sources which proves this is not so - both dismissed flippantly.
Last reply from me as there is never much point in arguing with fools.
You'd have to search backwards to learn how it came up. The original argument has been lost in the mist of time.wtf does whether or not they only play slams/focus on slams have to do with it anyway?
As I said earlier, it's at best irrelevant and at worst does the opposite of supporting what you trying to say (ie. that women's tennis is as popular as mens)