I dunnno. It feels like however many runs England score, India will always score more (in India). England have knocked over the top order twice now (through some good bowling and some sloppy indian batting) and yet India have still managed 350+. Plus these wickets were about as favourable to England as they get in India. They haven't played on a slow wicket yet.I actually think this is two excellent one-day teams going at it with India nudging marginally ahead. You cannot complain with an England which sets 350 or comes within 16 or so runs of chasing down 380 really. Hopefully England can get something from the dead rubber as 2-1 would seem the fair result for these two teams. The England One-Day team does not deserve the same level of criticism as the Test team.
India or England would be a good punt for the Champions' Trophy.
Is it just me who thinks Root should be opening in ODIs?morgan is my boi but his form has been very patchy and billings is such a gun, too good to be left out. i'd drop hales though before i dropped morgan for billings.the people calling for bairstow in place of morgan are the real weirdos.
Yeah I agree with this. Indias bowlers have the edge on ours which is the diference in the two sides, both batting line ups are equally formidable. I suspect in English conditions the situation may be reversed with our bowlers having that slight edge, so I have decent expectations for the CT.I actually think this is two excellent one-day teams going at it with India nudging marginally ahead. You cannot complain with an England which sets 350 or comes within 16 or so runs of chasing down 380 really. Hopefully England can get something from the dead rubber as 2-1 would seem the fair result for these two teams. The England One-Day team does not deserve the same level of criticism as the Test team.
India or England would be a good punt for the Champions' Trophy.
Anderson 152.2 overs at the death econ 7.17So you're comparing players' stats from the past two years, where ODI scores have been higher by a distance than ever before, with one player's stats from the four years previous. Presumably they are also stats from the whole innings as opposed to the opening spells. All of those bowlers, Willey and Woakes especially, have been required to bowl at the death, which Jimmy rarely ever did.
I don't think stats are likely to tell the full story here. The point is, what we don't require as of this moment is yet another bowler who can start their spell economically, or like Willey take early wickets, before being useless in the middle and death overs, leaving the burden on the other four main bowlers. That's what Jimmy will do. He isn't what we need right now.
Right, again, I presume those stats are his entire career right? From what 2003 until 2015? If you'd watched Jimmy in those last few years you would know for a fact that he was a terrible, terrible death bowler. Fantastic at the start of an innings (much like Willey and Woakes) but genuinely terrible at the death. No ridiculously skewed stats you can throw at me will change that fact.Anderson 152.2 overs at the death econ 7.17
Broad 101.2 overs econ 7.27
Woakes 66.0 overs econ 8.20
Willey 14.4 econ 8.04
Jordan 23.2 econ 9.51
None of Root, Billings or Moeen would be awful calls IMO. It is hard to guess who they'll go with though; I'd probably have my money on the straight swap.No idea who they'll open with.
England have done really well. Wickets doing all sorts.England openers are batting so cluelessly..
Batting like club cricketers here
There have been 15 or so play and misses in 8 or so overs.. and majority of them by Billings, who is looking absolutely cr**.