• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Pakistan in Australia 2016/17

Tangles

International Vice-Captain
There used to be a trade off between using a heavy 3lb bat and a lighter one that was say 2lb 7. That trade off was bat speed and control. Very few people could create the same bat speed with a 3lb bat as with the lighter one. A lighter bat allowed a player to play later and generate more bat speed.

Modern bats don't have the trade off. Light and big with a larger profile than the old 3lb bats. It's an advantage to the batsman with no comparable technology shift to help bowlers. Drs is how they are trying to even it out.
 

TNT

Banned
There used to be a trade off between using a heavy 3lb bat and a lighter one that was say 2lb 7. That trade off was bat speed and control. Very few people could create the same bat speed with a 3lb bat as with the lighter one. A lighter bat allowed a player to play later and generate more bat speed.

Modern bats don't have the trade off. Light and big with a larger profile than the old 3lb bats. It's an advantage to the batsman with no comparable technology shift to help bowlers. Drs is how they are trying to even it out.
When I try to find this advantage to the batsmen I cant find where it is, bowlers in the last ten years have taken more wickets per match (30.5) than the 90's (29.4) and 80's (29.7). Batsmen have only increased their output per wicket by 2 runs per wicket and teams do bat deeper than previous so I think that's where the extra runs come from. Batsmen definitely score faster that's for sure but that is good for the game and I would hate to see efforts made to slow the game down.

Batsmen 1-5 in the 60's averaged 38.87 runs per innings, the last ten yeas batsmen 1-5 average 40.43 which is 1.56 runs per innings more.
 
Last edited:

Compton

International Debutant
If there's no trade off, then why don't all players have Warner-sized bats? Oversimplification in my book.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah edges never went for four runs in the 90's. Those guys in the 90's only ever hit the middle of the bat, wow they were the days.
I played cricket for 20 years and I dont think that there would've have been 50 leading edges that cleared the ring and went for 4 in those matches

Warner probably does it 20 times a season and whilst he has very fast hands, he also benefits from playing with a bat that basically has 3 faces on it

Give him Barry Richards' bat to use and many of those simply lob straight up in the air so he would be forced to change his game
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Lyon has 1 more innings to salvage his test career IMO

Unless he performs well, I'd leave him out for Sydney and might not even take him to India
 

Pup Clarke

Cricketer Of The Year
I'm not a spin bowling connoisseur by any stretch , but only thing that is noticeable about Lyon is that he very rarely alters the speed o his arm. He has a quick motion through his delivery stride, and I wonder whether this contributes to him bowling consistently the same speed. Warne and Vettori are spinners who immediately come to mind as bowlers who could 'hold back' their deliveries or fire one in (i.e Warne's flipper) Just an observation
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
I played cricket for 20 years and I dont think that there would've have been 50 leading edges that cleared the ring and went for 4 in those matches

Warner probably does it 20 times a season and whilst he has very fast hands, he also benefits from playing with a bat that basically has 3 faces on it

Give him Barry Richards' bat to use and many of those simply lob straight up in the air so he would be forced to change his game
Agreed.

Batsman nowadays definitely have it easier.

It's so much easier to score runs with faster outfields, considerably better bats, smaller grounds..

Thats why usually ..a 100 now doesn't feel as special as it used to.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Agreed.

Batsman nowadays definitely have it easier.

It's so much easier to score runs with faster outfields, considerably better bats, smaller grounds..

Thats why usually ..a 100 now doesn't feel as special as it used to.
Do you think batting is easier now than it was, say 10 years ago?

I think it's swung back a touch towards bowlers these days than it was a decade or so back.

Then again, that might be because these days there aren't as many good players as there were a decade or so back.
 
Last edited:

dontcloseyoureyes

BARNES OUT
If there's no trade off, then why don't all players have Warner-sized bats? Oversimplification in my book.
While Warner's bat is definitely on the large side of the spectrum, all bats these days are ****ing huge. One of the guys in my team has one of Maddo's bats that he used for net sessions and it's like a ****in' tree trunk, it's ridiculous.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah they are all massive. I've got a cue that's about 6-7 years old, and it has big edges for its time, but it's like a toothpick compared with Burgeinho's.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That's a nuisance. Time for the lower-middle order to step up.
Wouldn't be before time.

Comms we're pretty stupid this morning (no spurprises) saying Australia were in the box seat at 160 behind with a couple starting to stay low. Big partnership this.
 

Compton

International Debutant
Commentary making a deal of that being a good bit of bowling. Not necessarily disagreeing - Wahab has bowled well - but that was just a **** shot from Khawaja.
 

Stapel

International Regular
Completely regardless of whomever you support, batsmen who are in the 90s at stumps, are not supposed to lose their wicket just after coming in the next morning, before getting 'there'. Just not cricket!
 

Top