Really, I don't think he would average more than 2 if you made him wear a blindfold.Warner is undoubtedly a talent but I doubt he averages more than 35 with a 90s bat
Surely Handscomb keeps if Wade bowls.throw the gloves to mad dog and have Wade skid one onto his pads imo
Didn't Tendulkar have basically the same bat in the 90s? I know he used a massive bat.Warner is undoubtedly a talent but I doubt he averages more than 35 with a 90s bat
Yeah edges never went for four runs in the 90's. Those guys in the 90's only ever hit the middle of the bat, wow they were the days.How many of his thick or leading edges go for 4?
Good player but a "modern" one
Probably the same size, but Warner's weighs less.Didn't Tendulkar have basically the same bat in the 90s? I know he used a massive bat.
Nowhere near that size.Didn't Tendulkar have basically the same bat in the 90s? I know he used a massive bat.
His bat isn't as heavy as it should be, though, that's the difference. He wouldn't be able to swing through the line as easily as he does or generate the same insane batspeed.I tried to get some pictures with better comparison.
View attachment 23072View attachment 23073
No doubt Warner's bat is thicker in the centre but the difference is not that huge. I think he would have been OK with using Tendulkar's bat
He wouldn't have, because Tendulkars was a good few ounces heavier.I tried to get some pictures with better comparison.
View attachment 23072View attachment 23073
No doubt Warner's bat is thicker in the centre but the difference is not that huge. I think he would have been OK with using Tendulkar's bat
Why wouldent he have, Warner is much stronger than Tendulkar and there is nothing to suggest he would not have adjusted to any size/weight bat and still performed just as good. How did you come up with this, is it just a wild guess or have you watched Warner struggle with a different size/weighted bat, how could you possibly know this?.He wouldn't have, because Tendulkars was a good few ounces heavier.