I confess I didn't listen that far. SorryIve been prounoucing it as burg from burger too. Pretty sure thats how howe and I said it on the podcast.
Damn this little passage was halarious.You've missed scores, he's had nine innings in South Africa and he's failed in 5 of them.
It's amazing. Since Howsie made that infamous "I've had enough of Virat Kohli" thread, Kohli has bossed it and KW's average has fallen off a cliff. I also remember someone making a "Can we all stop pretending Tim Southee isn't the second best fast bowler in the world" or something around 18 months back. Southee promptly proceeded to stink up every match he's played since then.In more thread-related news, Kane Williamson now averages below 50 in all forms of the game
Calling it now before we see posters make gambhiring threads like this about all their most-hated players from opposition sidesIt's amazing. Since Howsie made that infamous "I've had enough of Virat Kohli" thread, Kohli has bossed it and KW's average has fallen off a cliff. I also remember someone making a "Can we all stop pretending Tim Southee isn't the second best fast bowler in the world" or something around 18 months back. Southee promptly proceeded to stink up every match he's played since then.
I look forward to the "When will Trent Boult get to 500 test wickets" thread.
That was me too iirc ha.It's amazing. Since Howsie made that infamous "I've had enough of Virat Kohli" thread, Kohli has bossed it and KW's average has fallen off a cliff. I also remember someone making a "Can we all stop pretending Tim Southee isn't the second best fast bowler in the world" or something around 18 months back. Southee promptly proceeded to stink up every match he's played since then.
I look forward to the "When will Trent Boult get to 500 test wickets" thread.
That turned into the "Let's have a Circle-Jerk over Adam Voges' Latest Failure" thread though (I was as guilty of it as the next person).There was also the Adam Voges Average Watch thread that seems to have ended his test career.
vcs started it?FTR no thread will change a cricketer's career better than Would Stuart Broad Make India's Strongest XI. It's on a plinth
I see where you're coming from. If you don't rate Smith, Taylor, Ashwin for the reasons above, that's also fine. But I think the one area you need to consider is the age and number of caps when talking about the likes of Smith, Kohli, Root, Williamson, Ashwin. There was a time when the players we argued and debated about already had a career and body of performances to show.I don't rate Smith, I also don't rate Taylor, I also don't rate Ashwin.
All of them have series and statistics you can use to counter that point, but all of them have more failings than successes when conditions got tough. If you like downhill skiing, then feel free to like those players. I prefer the guys that constantly average more than their team mates across all series because they're that much better, and show in tough conditions that they can find a way to succeed.
Smith hasn't done that yet, Williamson hasn't done it consistently enough, Root most definitely has more than the others have, Kohli is starting to show signs but none of them have the lineage of an Amla, or De Villiers or Sangakkara.
And my contention isn't that Smith is bad, my contention is that Smith is a guy whose talent means he should average 45, not 55, and without a bumper season against some of the worst bowling at test level you'll ever see from India and the Windies - that's exactly where he'd be.
And that's why it should have been directed at the sources and parties responsible for that rather than the player himself.That was me too iirc ha.
Although let's be clear here, I've never said Kohli couldn't become world class. My problem wasn't even with him really, it was that he was rated so highly as a test cricketer whilst averaging 44 or something at 27.
haha this **** again. The problem is that you actually haven't seen Smith's good performances. Think i had this same **** conversation a year or so ago when someone brought up three of his best knocks came in 13/14 Ashes and the SA series that followed and this genius actually downplayed that by saying either he didn't see them or that Smitteh was batting too low.Try arguing with that. The bottom line is that you have to go back to 2013 to find the last series of which Steven Smith average less than 40. Australia had some monumental collapses at the time but he was the only bloke to consistently perform all over the world i mean **** it Smith scored half of the team runs last week on a pitch that was seaming like ****.I don't rate Smith, I also don't rate Taylor, I also don't rate Ashwin.
All of them have series and statistics you can use to counter that point, but all of them have more failings than successes when conditions got tough. If you like downhill skiing, then feel free to like those players. I prefer the guys that constantly average more than their team mates across all series because they're that much better, and show in tough conditions that they can find a way to succeed.
Smith hasn't done that yet, Williamson hasn't done it consistently enough, Root most definitely has more than the others have, Kohli is starting to show signs but none of them have the lineage of an Amla, or De Villiers or Sangakkara.
And my contention isn't that Smith is bad, my contention is that Smith is a guy whose talent means he should average 45, not 55, and without a bumper season against some of the worst bowling at test level you'll ever see from India and the Windies - that's exactly where he'd be.
he's clearly a top quality australian banter lad merchant.The crap show Roots then?