Yes & no. Good to create a winning culture, not good repeatedly winning by the skin of their teeth against teams ranked as low as 9 as the Pumas are currently.Not a dour match in the end.. error ridden though. SA keeps getting away with it, which is a good way to build a winning team culture.
Boks gotta start playing better... but if we were losing on top of that the rhetoric would be abysmal. (Its also not good for my anxiety levels.)Yes & no. Good to create a winning culture, not good repeatedly winning by the skin of their teeth against teams ranked as low as 9 as the Pumas are currently.
I'm blaming the coach tbh.Wallabies are just ****ing awful and I cannot see them winning a match this year
It's tempting to blame the coach in these situations but the reality is that there are a lot of incompetent players in the squad
Some of the selections and tactics were questionable but the basic skill level was appallingI'm blaming the coach tbh.
I don't understand why Slipper isn't starting.
And none of your forwards can be bothered going into rucks. Laying that on the coach and game plan.
i dunno why someone who wants to talk about rugby with top ten lists and whatnot would give out such a clear sign that no one should bother talking to him about rugbywhy does francis censor "New Zealand'?
other than the fact he has daddy issues that is
Apples and oranges position wise, but yeah, the guy is fast becoming a 'great All Black', no doubt.Brodie Retallick's early career has been just as impressive as Richie McCaw's. The guy is outrageous.
Kinda artificial in that he's a second or third choice player so usually only plays against lower ranked teams.Just been playing around with Rugby's statsguru & holy ****, how's this following statistic in terms off emphasising the All Black dominance in recent times....
If he plays in this weekends Bledisloe in Welllington, it will be prop Wyatt Crockett's 50th test match, and in that time he's only been involved in 1 just one loss....Just **** insane.
49 tests, 47 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss....
I agree. I mean that was a really, really stupid post. Maybe there was a Bokkie who played as substitute a lot when Nick Mallet's side went undefeated around 1998 (didn't they win 15 Tests in a row or something?). He'd have an awesome record.Kinda artificial in that he's a second or third choice player so usually only plays against lower ranked teams.
I agree. I mean that was a really, really stupid post. Maybe there was a Bokkie who played as substitute a lot when Nick Mallet's side went undefeated around 1998 (didn't they win 15 Tests in a row or something?). He'd have an awesome record. .
South Africa never lost at home at all for the first 50 years of the 20th century.