DoG's Test Innings and Bowling Performances. Updates thread.

[honestbharani]

Laxman's 96 at Mohali in 2010?

 

[Days of Grace]

Laxman's 96 at Mohali in 2010?

I assume you mean the 73*? 11.08

 

[Zinzan]

What about Mark Richardson's 89 vs. India in this match? 1st Test: New Zealand v India at Wellington, Dec 12-14, 2002 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo

 

[OverratedSanity]

I assume you mean the 73*? 11.08

Think he might've meant the Durban 96

 

[Days of Grace]

What about Mark Richardson's 89 vs. India in this match? 1st Test: New Zealand v India at Wellington, Dec 12-14, 2002 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo

9.31

 

[OverratedSanity]

Dravid's 76 from the same match pls

 

[Zinzan]

Cheers, lower than I thought since the conditions were so hard for batting. That said, fairly ordinary Indian bowling attack.

 

[Days of Grace]

Think he might've meant the Durban 96

13.95

 

[Days of Grace]

Dravid's 76 from the same match pls

8.72

 

[OverratedSanity]

13.95

Nice. Must be one of the higher rated innings<100. Any way to find which sub 100 innings is numero uno ?

Btw, why do you have the (X runs/100) modifier for those innings? The base score already includes runs scored anyway, doesn't it? So why include number of runs scored as a parameter again? I sort of liked that there were several 50-99 scores in the top 100 before.

 

[honestbharani]

I assume you mean the 73*? 11.08

Yeah.. I got them both mixed up. I actually wanted the rating of both the Mohali 73 and the Durban 96, if it is not too much trouble for you


EDIT: See you put them both. You are awesome And so is VVS, tbh.

 

[Days of Grace]

Nice. Must be one of the higher rated innings<100. Any way to find which sub 100 innings is numero uno ?

Btw, why do you have the (X runs/100) modifier for those innings? The base score already includes runs scored anyway, doesn't it? So why include number of runs scored as a parameter again? I sort of liked that there were several 50-99 scores in the top 100 before.

Because innings like Kallis' 60-odd in 1998 against Australia would be rated too high.

There would be a lot of lower scores in low team totals in lost causes with higher ratings than larger scores that had a lot more influence on the match.

 

[honestbharani]

Can we potentially reduce the weightage though? I mean if an innings of less than 100 stands out, it must mostly mean a very very difficult track + attack right?

 

[ankitj]

* The value next to the opposition represents the rating of each bowling attack.

6 VVS Laxman 281 Australia 574 Kolkata 2001 19.16
8 Saeed Anwar 188* India 608 Kolkata 1999 18.78

Is it true?

 

[OverratedSanity]

Haha that's exactly what I was taken aback by.

 

[Days of Grace]

Is it true?

Yes. Take a look at the individual ratings of each bowler on the respective teams at the time.

 

[ankitj]

Always knew Australian bowlers were hack compared to ours.

 

[Days of Grace]

Can we potentially reduce the weightage though? I mean if an innings of less than 100 stands out, it must mostly mean a very very difficult track + attack right?

I will give you a specific example:

Kallis' 65* out of a team total of 128 chasing 350+ in the 4th inns against Australia in 2001.

That innings has an unadjusted rating of 12.48. Is there anyone who thinks that innings deserves to rated above countless other centuries that contributed to wins/herioc draws?

No. Thus I came up with the idea of multiplying innings under 100 by (score/100).

And believe me, I have tried a lot of other methods :-)

For bowlers, it's the same: (under 5 wkts/5)

 

[Burgey]

How about my all round performance against a strong St Bernadette's side in under 10s in 1979/80 at Pitt Park, Merrylands, a noted difficult concrete pitch? 111* coming in at 1/4 out of a total of 3/240, then 8/13 opening he bowling? Gotta be up there.

 

[Red]

How about my all round performance against a strong St Bernadette's side in under 10s in 1979/80 at Pitt Park, Merrylands, a noted difficult concrete pitch? 111* coming in at 1/4 out of a total of 3/240, then 8/13 opening he bowling? Gotta be up there.

Compo ball or not?