It's not over the top, he's insanely overrated in test cricket. He's closer to Darren Bravo than he is to any of the big three, as I said though you wouldn't believe it with the way he's talked about.
ftfyMake NZ great for once!!!
Like I said, right now he's closer to Darren Bravo than Kane Williamson.
Check the breakdown of KW's and Kohli's records. Maybe that will give you some perspective.
Right now you're being dumb.Like I said, right now he's closer to Darren Bravo than Kane Williamson.
the thing you use to pump for corey and santa
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN CricinfoNo he's not. His average is closer to Kane's than Bravo's hey (since that is what you pointed out in your opening post).
So the last year doesn't count, nor does the last 2-3. And we can't use career averages. What are we allowed to use?yeah okay cool we'll play by your rules as to what years and runs count. You've successfully "called Kohli out on this"
Good job.
What I find depressing about these numbers is it re-emphasises that KW will be lucky to play even 2-thirds of the Test matches that Root will in the next decade or so, unless something dramatically changes with the FTP (not even sure they call it that anymore).Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Since the start of 2014 when the big three all took their games to the next level.
I never claimed any of this. Use what you want. But my advice would be don't get worked up about a guy with 12 centuries, who scored 4 centuries in one series in Australia, and who averages 46, being rated highly.So the last year doesn't count, nor does the last 2-3. And we can't use career averages. What are we allowed to use?
Our opinions. Because anything and everything in this thread, and most others, is opinions. If you were born in Nagpur, yours would be different to being born in a silage hut in ND. It's just how life is.So the last year doesn't count, nor does the last 2-3. And we can't use career averages. What are we allowed to use?
Given its a current world XI and Steyn's injury troubles his absence makes sense.I really do not see anyone suggesting otherwise in this thread, or maybe I am getting a different drift to what you have been from these posts. Its just that Starc or Broad over Steyn is so much more laughably silly in this era's world XI than Kohli over KW...
This is such a good post.Our opinions. Because anything and everything in this thread, and most others, is opinions. If you were born in Nagpur, yours would be different to being born in a silage hut in ND. It's just how life is.
There's no point banging the keyboard over and over with the same point, living in hope you'll shift people's opinions. Funny thing about the internet that, there's almost zero % success rate of someone going 'mmm, actually after the 10+ posts, name calling and sarcasm, I actually see where you're going with that, and my viewpoint has now shifted to yours'. Yet people all over the internet try it on varying platforms every minute of every day.
Shut up, ****. No it isn't.This is such a good post.
Hiw convenient that it includes a series where Kohli did badly in England. It's as if it's been deliberately picked to emphasise a point.Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Since the start of 2014 when the big three all took their games to the next level.
Seriously.....Hiw convenient that it includes a series where Kohli did badly in England. It's as if it's been deliberately picked to emphasise a point.
Let's use this since it shows kohli in a much more favorable light :Seriously.....
Okay so we can't use career records, we can't use the last year, we can't use the last two years and we can't use the last three. FMD.