Yes, but you said they'd chase 250+ when they were 260 behind with (now) 5 wickets in the shed.........how many are you expecting them to have to chase and do you believe they can?? Cos from where I'm sitting Aus are ****ed big time.The reason I am saying this is because both Warner and Smith are quality batsmen and have demonstrated ability to bat well in these conditions. If Warner clicks and gets a Warneresque hundred, they can chase around 300.. And still feel there is a big hundred from Smith coming in this series. Don't know about the rest though.
Didn't get this and I only just realised Starc's married to Alyssa Healy. Guess you're more up on the WAGs and goss than I am eh.Go away Alyssa
Siddle wouldn't let injury get in his way of victory, Warne was right about Mitchy.
A fair few of those averages have headed dramatically south in this series so far. Which is a much better indicator of the likelihood of them getting these runs.Giving Burns a 50 and Voges a 90 is extremely generous.
I am not being sarcastic. I am also not saying Australia are winning this guaranteed. All I am saying is, Australia are in this game. Anything under 300 and they have a shot. Warner and Smith hundreds are not implausible or unrealistic. And yeah I wouldn't mind betting.Yes, but you said they'd chase 250+ when they were 260 behind with (now) 5 wickets in the shed.........how many are you expecting them to have to chase and do you believe they can?? Cos from where I'm sitting Aus are ****ed big time.
If you really believe the Aussies are still in this you should get on em at 7.00. Or are you being "sarcastic" again??
OK. So according to that they have 9 runs to play with to be "in this game".I am not being sarcastic. I am also not saying Australia are winning this guaranteed. All I am saying is, Australia are in this game. Anything under 300 and they have a shot. Warner and Smith hundreds are not implausible or unrealistic. And yeah I wouldn't mind betting.
Talking about betting, I have money on SL at 3.75 and I am not going to cash out unless there's some serious rain.And yeah I wouldn't mind betting.
I wouldn't know what test cricket is mate. I can barely watch 4 overs a bowler bowls in T20.OK. So according to that they have 9 runs to play with to be "in this game".
Edit:
Hey heard of this thing called test cricket? Try it's cool
The 60ao wipes out the million they got at Lords straight back to average score anyway.I wonder what the average Australian team total is over the past five years away from home. Have there been any big outliers, I guess Lord's last year off the top of my head.
I can see what you mean. But how many times has it happened that a winning 4th innings was actually the biggest innings of a test?.I am not being sarcastic. I am also not saying Australia are winning this guaranteed. All I am saying is, Australia are in this game. Anything under 300 and they have a shot. Warner and Smith hundreds are not implausible or unrealistic. And yeah I wouldn't mind betting.
So you didn't like the second part of my post??I wouldn't know what test cricket is mate. I can barely watch 4 overs a bowler bowls in T20.
Not sure why you're taking this so personally though.