• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best ever Limited Overs batsman ever, 32 man knockout tournament, tourney thread.

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
How is it being a formality better than A.B vs Viv or Sachin in the ist round.

Seeding works IMO
Seeding is irrelevant if you're looking for a outright winner as whoever they play they'll beat regardless.

In a knockout, only 1 place can be determined so it doesn't matter either way. Seeding just makes the first round a procession
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
FWIW, I REALLY tend to oscillate between Sachin and Viv as the best ODI batsman of all time.. Its just that today I am thinking it is Sir Viv.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
The average is great due to not outs, and the SR probably is too, but it's a run of the mill RPI. A great run of form inevitably involves an RPI thats better than your career average at the least.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
TBF, Klusener was the senior partner and needed to shepherd Donald there.

His 0*(5) in the 2003 exit went further in proving that he wasn't a complete ODI batsman by any stretch of imagination.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The average is great due to not outs, and the SR probably is too, but it's a run of the mill RPI. A great run of form inevitably involves an RPI thats better than your career average at the least.

he often batted at 7, 8 and sometimes even 9 tho

surely that must go some way to explaining the low RPI
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
he often batted at 7, 8 and sometimes even 9 tho

surely that must go some way to explaining the low RPI
yeah it explains the low RPI, but it also doesn't necessarily strengthen the case for calling it the ATB WC performance, unless you mean statistically with the average. Runs are runs, and scoring a lot of them is better than not scoring a lot of them.
 
Last edited:

viriya

International Captain
Klusener in '99 World Cup was simply unstoppable (still Donald decided not to run)
Yea imagine how the cricket narrative would be different now if they had completed that run.

If I were Donald it'd haunt me in my dreams...
 

Top