I think both are good, can see both in an England jersey in 5 years time. Sam probably has more potential though.Is it Tom or Sam Curran who's the good one?
Now you're moving the goal posts mate - the original post referred to foreign players, and most of that lot are officially regarded as English in terms of international qualification.1. Jason Roy
2. Aaron Finch (os)
3. Kumar Sangakkara (os)
4. Vikram Solanki
5. Gary Wilson +
6. Azhar Mahmood
7. Tom Curran
8. Stuart Meaker
9. Mathew Pillans
10. Ravi Rampaul
11. Jade Dernbach
If they could get Solanki out of retirement for a match, here's a Surrey T20 XI of all overseas-born players.
Buttler as a red ball batsmen could have a huge summer if he knuckles down.Thought it was questionable that Lancs got Prince to go back on his retirement last year. Sure he got them back in the first division but what good is that now? Short term bump but really they needed others to show they can score runs.
Looking at their squad (in relation to the other teams) I can't see them staying up. They'll need two or three of what I call average county pros (Brown, Croft, Bailey, Clarke) to really progress to the next level and/or Anderson to win them a load of games when he's available and/or win most games at home on spinning wickets - if they are to stay up.
Hameed and Saqib are very good prospects but they ain't going to be game changers yet in a division 1 that continues to get stronger.
Haven't decided yet who I think will be the other team to go down.
Oh, yeah, I'm not being remotely serious about it.Now you're moving the goal posts mate - the original post referred to foreign players, and most of that lot are officially regarded as English in terms of international qualification.
tbh though I'd forgotten about Finch, and I've never heard of Pillans.
He is, but he's injured.is Hastings at Durham again?
if so then go durham
Also Trott, yeah it's not a bad bet, with the likes of Hain coming through.What do people think of Warwickshires chance for the title this year?Should have Woakes and Bell for most if not the whole year.Look pretty good value to me at 6/1.Yorkshire look a bit short at 7/4,especially if they lose Ballance to England.
Didn't stop them last season and doubt it will this, strongest bowling attack and plenty of good options in the batting.What do people think of Warwickshires chance for the title this year?Should have Woakes and Bell for most if not the whole year.Look pretty good value to me at 6/1.Yorkshire look a bit short at 7/4,especially if they lose Ballance to England.
tbh I didn't realise you hadn't put Barker in that team. I think he definitely plays when he's fit. Good new ball bowler, makes rough for jeetan and good lower order bat.Barker is a pretty good back up seamer but yeah the others are a little thin. Gordon/H-D are primarily our limited overs bowlers which is a plus as it means the first class guys can be rotated/rested.
Patel was one of Wisden's cricketers of the year 2 years ago and has been one of the best players in County Champ for years.Middlesex should do well again this year, we've got voges for the first half of the season and hopefully Finn can play a few games for us before England's season starts.
Warwickshire have a great squad I expect trott and bell to score massively and they won't be going on intl duty so the batting should be strong all season. Is Patel a decent overseas? I just think a team hoping to compete with Yorkshire for the title should go all out and sign a top class overseas, (a seamer in warwickshire's case.)