Stokes is the most damaging as a batsman by far (though Anderson can also tap it)M.Marsh is the best bowler of the lot, Stokes the best batsmen probably (not that much in it but he clearly has played innings far and above the rest). Would say Anderson has a fair bit more to prove as not sure he has made massive impact with either discipline yet.
Nah Stokes shades MMarsh with the ball IMO. Marsh has overperformed a bit with the ball in his career to date, and Stokes hasn't realised his ability yet (Ian Bell dropped catches not helping much, either).M.Marsh is the best bowler of the lot, Stokes the best batsmen probably (not that much in it but he clearly has played innings far and above the rest). Would say Anderson has a fair bit more to prove as not sure he has made massive impact with either discipline yet.
Stokes bowls a lot of garbage even when he is bowling well though (Van Zyl's dismissal also makes up for Bell's catching. One of the worst balls to get a wicket as I've seen). Marsh seems much more consistent, if slightly less threatening.Nah Stokes shades MMarsh with the ball IMO. Marsh has overperformed a bit with the ball in his career to date, and Stokes hasn't realised his ability yet (Ian Bell dropped catches not helping much, either).
Yeah, I'm rating Stokes a lot more on potential/what I think he can do as compared to what he's actually done at Test level. But he's a guy who can bowl 140+, swings the ball and has a slightly awkward action to face. He adds any semblance of consistency to that, and he's got the potential to be anything.Stokes bowls a lot of garbage even when he is bowling well though (Van Zyl's dismissal also makes up for Bell's catching. One of the worst balls to get a wicket as I've seen). Marsh seems much more consistent, if slightly less threatening.
how the **** does this get 6 likes (i know it's 5 but there's an inevitable ***** like coming)how good are counter attacks in test cricket? One of the best things about the sport.
Yeah that is fair, Marsh is unlikely to ever take 6 for 30 odd like Stokes did in TB.Yeah, I'm rating Stokes a lot more on potential/what I think he can do as compared to what he's actually done at Test level. But he's a guy who can bowl 140+, swings the ball and has a slightly awkward action to face. He adds any semblance of consistency to that, and he's got the potential to be anything.
MMarsh is, though also inconsistent, a steadier bowler right now -- I don't disagree with you at all. But Stokes at his best blows MMarsh away entirely.
Looks like it depends on his calf.Odds on Root getting past the 80s this time?
My wicket.Mellon being upgraded to basketball.
202-4
Still think he is overrated as hell in test cricket.What an absolute fraud of a test bowler Morne Morkel is.