Skyliner
International 12th Man
Look at the team we beat, and then honestly question whether the performances we put in would have been good enough to beat decent opposition.Waaaaaah
Look at the team we beat, and then honestly question whether the performances we put in would have been good enough to beat decent opposition.Waaaaaah
look at your posts and honestly question whether anyone gives a ****Look at the team we beat, and then honestly question whether the performances we put in would have been good enough to beat decent opposition.
Test opener Tom Latham has been called in on standby for Williamson, on whom New Zealand's management aren't about to take any chances.
Meanwhile Sri Lanka's ambitions in the ODI and T20 series have been hit by the withdrawal of star fast bowler Lasith Malinga.
You tricked us all by putting Latham in your team there, but as can be seen from the squad you also posted, he's serving only as KW cover.ODI Squad is
Brendon McCullum (c), Doug Bracewell, Martin Guptill, Matt Henry (first two ODIs)*, Mitchell McClenaghan, Adam Milne, Henry Nicholls, Luke Ronchi, Mitchell Santner, Ish Sodhi, Ross Taylor, Kane Williamson, George Worker.
*Tim Southee will join the squad for the third ODI
Probably looking at
Guptill
Latham
Williamson
Taylor
BMac
Worker
Ronchi
Milne
Sodhi
Henry
Mitch M
Leaves Nicholls, Santner, Bracewell to play in game 2. Henry will probably play first 2 ODI's then they sub in Southee? Sure McCullum will rest at some point so Kane can captain.
Wonder what Boult will be doing in the meantime to try and get some of his rhythm and form back?
Most teams today are pretty bad anyway. You don't need to play your best to beat them.Look at the team we beat, and then honestly question whether the performances we put in would have been good enough to beat decent opposition.
In the Taylor era we beat a stronger Sri Lankan side in Sri Lanka, and Australia in Australia.
Yes because the performances put in in this Test are literally exactly the same performances we'll be putting into playing other teams, because each game is homogenous.Look at the team we beat, and then honestly question whether the performances we put in would have been good enough to beat decent opposition.
Our bowling without a firing Boult looks a lot less classy.I think this sri lankan side played better at times than the one that toured last summer despite having sangakkara in it.
They were one competent batting display or one KW wicket away from a good chance at 1-1, despite losing their two best pacemen and keeper to various things and deciding not to play kaushal silva
I think what is overlooked in this Test is how well the Sri Lankan seamers operated as a unit. Pradeep and Lakmal supported Chameera really really well, and they weren't relying on Herath to spin us out. It was one of the better cohesive bowling efforts I've seen from a team touring New Zealand in recent years. I think we're vastly underrating how well they bowled if we talk about a poor NZ performance that wouldn't knock over Australia.I think this sri lankan side played better at times than the one that toured last summer despite having sangakkara in it.
They were one competent batting display or one KW wicket away from a good chance at 1-1, despite losing their two best pacemen and keeper to various things and deciding not to play kaushal silva
Yeah as long as Boult continues to be more Shane O'Connor than Wasim Akram NZ will struggle. Here's hoping a few weeks rest and some time working on his action will help kick him back into Rhythm.Our bowling without a firing Boult looks a lot less classy.
Prasad would have been ideal. It's unfortunate that PHT Kausha's progress have been halted. Would have been threatening because he gives it a mighty rip.I think what is overlooked in this Test is how well the Sri Lankan seamers operated as a unit. Pradeep and Lakmal supported Chameera really really well, and they weren't relying on Herath to spin us out. It was one of the better cohesive bowling efforts I've seen from a team touring New Zealand in recent years. I think we're vastly underrating how well they bowled if we talk about a poor NZ performance that wouldn't knock over Australia.
My bad. I really thought Lat-ham was there.You tricked us all by putting Latham in your team there, but as can be seen from the squad you also posted, he's serving only as KW cover.
Post of the day.I think what is overlooked in this Test is how well the Sri Lankan seamers operated as a unit. Pradeep and Lakmal supported Chameera really really well, and they weren't relying on Herath to spin us out. It was one of the better cohesive bowling efforts I've seen from a team touring New Zealand in recent years. I think we're vastly underrating how well they bowled if we talk about a poor NZ performance that wouldn't knock over Australia.
Really? I don't think Taylor applied himself well at all given the circumstances. He was hooking almost every ball in a match where there had been only 4 batsmen out in a manner other than caught. As I was watching I had the sense that it was just a matter of time while he faced Chameera, and surely enough he top edged one to fine leg before long. Don't get me wrong, he played some quite nice shots, but it was just frustrating watching him playing into SRL's incredibly obvious plans. I actually think McCullum applied himself much better than Ross (at least he did until the target required went below 80 - then he started playing some disgusting shots).Post of the day.
This was not Zimbabwe bowling to us. Ross is good value for his ICC ranking of 12th in the world. You know he comes to life in an uphill skiing situation. The fact that he really applied himself and could only make 35, giving 100% effort, says how challenging it was out there in the middle. Lakmal was like a metronome and proceeded to make short work of the rookie Santner.
Ok, sure. But it was a very dumb tactic given that Sri Lanka had only one bowler capable of executing the short ball with the necessary pace and accuracy to make it a threat. Can happily say that I'm not alone in this point of view either.No. This post is not accurate @bahnz
The tactic the boss and Kane decided upon was to go ahead and play controlled pull shots. Kane kept it up throughout his whole inning because his technique is sublime.
The boss came unglued on one pull shot and he went from low to high instead of coming down on the ball. Right idea wrong execution. The boss put 100% effort into his inning and could only make 35. That highlights just how good Kane's inning was by comparison. In closing Kane and Ross both tried to use the same tactic.
yeah let's play the shot into the area with three fielders standing in a line, good percentage cricket
is this an ego thing? not going to accept short bowling from the little sri lankans/kiwis?
Such a terrible, irresponsible inning from Ross Taylor.