• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pro-Wrestling Thread II

Teja.

Teja.

Global Moderator
The story development has been dire but TLC has the potential to be a pretty solid PPV quality wise, the match combinations and quality of wrestlers combined with the gimmick matches is great. The main event left alone has potential too, Shaemus has form in TLC and has always been a good wrestler and Roman usually is much better in Non-DQ settings but I'm expecting some terrible 4-on-1 shenanigans to justify Shaemus holding on to the belt while still making Roman look strong.
 
Teja.

Teja.

Global Moderator
Jono, watch nxt takeover london on wednesday instead of hate watching tater tot ****. Going to be off the charts.
 
Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
I know in hindsight 1995 was an absolutely awful year of wrestling for WWF, but I loved the Diesel / Michaels storyline.
 
sledger

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Teja. said:
The story development has been dire but TLC has the potential to be a pretty solid PPV quality wise, the match combinations and quality of wrestlers combined with the gimmick matches is great. The main event left alone has potential too, Shaemus has form in TLC and has always been a good wrestler and Roman usually is much better in Non-DQ settings but I'm expecting some terrible 4-on-1 shenanigans to justify Shaemus holding on to the belt while still making Roman look strong.
Click to expand...
The quality of the in ring stuff isn't the problem tbf. In ring things are, across the board, match to match, as good as they have ever been if not better. It's just everything else that has gone to the wall.
 
Spikey

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
if wwe had a sense of humour, when the inevitable DQ/4 on 1 happens in the Roman match, Wade or Rusev or someone should get a bag of frozen 'tater tots' from under the ring and hit Roman with them
 
Teja.

Teja.

Global Moderator
sledger said:
The quality of the in ring stuff isn't the problem tbf. In ring things are, across the board, match to match, as good as they have ever been if not better. It's just everything else that has gone to the wall.
Click to expand...
Yeah I know, just trying to hype myself up for TLC I guess considering how WWE utterly failed in that regard despite actually having a solid card.
 
Last edited:
Athlai

Athlai

Not Terrible
OverratedSanity said:
The build to Owens vs Ambrose has been so pathetic. Shame as well, since those two are so good on the mic.
Click to expand...
I mean as I said before. They had SFA time.

I honestly don't have too much of a problem with a lot of Raw at the moment but FMD the Reigns storyline which has now been extended to a good 7 other guys is so cringe worthy. Cena was never this difficult to watch, I actually skip the Reigns speaking segments now.

The rest of the card's build hasn't been remarkable either way, definitely nothing has been good enough to salvage the rubbish at the top.

Looking forward to Lucha Dragons winning the ladder match. Hoping\ we get Kalisto doing his finisher off the top of a ladder, would be insane.
 
Spikey

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ambrose-Owens shouldn't even be happening. Either Amborse takes another loss or the one good (singles) champion WWE has loses. Surely alternatives could have been planned
 
Athlai

Athlai

Not Terrible
Spikey said:
Ambrose-Owens shouldn't even be happening. Either Amborse takes another loss or the one good (singles) champion WWE has loses. Surely alternatives could have been planned
Click to expand...
Hoping for shenanigans. It isn't a gimmick match right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top