#IntentNo they aren't. Lakmal has been garbage anytime I've watched him.
Is there a reason Sri Lanka have bowled here btw?
They've been stitched up again by all the talk of a green seamer. Because Baz is a useless tosser it's been a great ploy: rave on and on about greenery and grass cover, get the opposition to insert you on a clayton's green seamer, a sheep dressed up in wolf's clothing.No they aren't. Lakmal has been garbage anytime I've watched him.
Is there a reason Sri Lanka have bowled here btw?
You mean SL?NZ quicks have spells where they look promising, but overall are mediocre trundlers who would interest no other international side not named Bangladesh or West Indies.
Both. Also flatter home pitches.Do New Zealand play more Test cricket these days or are their best players just going through purpler purple patches?
5 of the top 7 years by New Zealand batsmen have been McCullum, Williamson or Taylor since 2012.
I have a sneaking suspicion you weren't optimistic about that before eitherThe way that Matthews is working Guptill over doesn't make me optimistic for his chances against Aus later this season.
Very very much so meant to say Sri Lanka.You mean SL?
Mathews in NZ is legitimately worth at least 2 players, no hyperbole. In English conditions with the Duke he's probably worth about 5, slight hyperbole.Mathews 4-2-3-0
The rest 10-2-43-0
Is your next prediction that the sun will rise in the east?The way that Matthews is working Guptill over doesn't make me optimistic for his chances against Aus later this season.
Hey there's always the chance that on pitches with less bounce, Guptill's inability to correctly judge length won't be as severely punished. Yeah, I know it's a dumb idea, so what.Is your next prediction that the sun will rise in the east?
Kane, unless you take Angelo's bowling into considerationAngelo or Kane.
Who's better right now?