Pratters
Cricket, Lovely Cricket
I never said 90-10. I said we had a 90% chance of winning. That has advantage plus India's prowess at home.Advantage doesn't mean 90-10.
I never said 90-10. I said we had a 90% chance of winning. That has advantage plus India's prowess at home.Advantage doesn't mean 90-10.
Im also hoping for an AB special... But geez it will probably be one of the ATG innings seeing as if he would have to do it himself.I am definitely not gambhiring. 250-270 is possible with a AB special. >300 is a winning score.
They couldn't care whether it goes 1 day or 5 as TV revenue is per match not per dayWhat are the chances of the BCCI trying to influence the indian dressing room just to get a third day out of this game?
I am definitely not gambhiring. 250-270 is possible with a AB special. >300 is a winning score.
So no chanceThey couldn't care whether it goes 1 day or 5 as TV revenue is per match not per day
Obelix didn't even like cricket.I think an Obelix would work better tbh..
WhyI don't mind teams preparing pitches that suit them, but this is not good for Test cricket.
Yeah but if matches consistently only go for three days, they'll eventually start getting smaller offers.They couldn't care whether it goes 1 day or 5 as TV revenue is per match not per day
It's a lottery for the batsmen, and no matter how much a batsman applies himself, he'll get a ball that he can't play.
Advertisers and sponsors won't be happy about losing 16 hours of time where they could potentially punt themselves.Yeah but if matches consistently only go for three days, they'll eventually start getting smaller offers.
No.It's a lottery for the batsmen, and no matter how much a batsman applies himself, he'll get a ball that he can't play.
The toss is far too important and, frankly, its boring.
A draw on the fifth afternoon, with the batting team 8 wickets down, and 30 needed to win, is far more exciting than teams being skittled for under 250 in every innings.