this is how the rest of us feel when you post about mitchell santnernobody cares about Taylor, phlegm.
Genuinely loldmust be 0?
Yes, Lara's 375 was in 1994 and Hayden's 380 came near the end of 2003.Didn't Lara go 10 years on 375 as his highest?
Yes, Lara's 375 was in 1994 and Hayden's 380 came near the end of 2003.
For the longest gap in time rather than by number of Tests, you have to check a whole new set of players; e.g. Hobbs scored 187 in 1910, and didn't improve on that until 1924. Freddie Brown (74 in March 1933; 79 in January 1951) might have the overall record.No, no, I meant his own individual highest score, which is what this thread is about. Lara got the 375 in 1994 and then made his 400 in 2004. So he had 10 years with the same highest score which has to be up there for actual specialist batsmen who went the longest with the same highest score.
For the longest gap in time rather than by number of Tests, you have to check a whole new set of players; e.g. Hobbs scored 187 in 1910, and didn't improve on that until 1924. Freddie Brown (74 in March 1933; 79 in January 1951) might have the overall record.
I mean that just isn't true at all.does it hurt knowing Taylor isn't going to hold any NZ batting records?
For the longest gap in time rather than by number of Tests, you have to check a whole new set of players; e.g. Hobbs scored 187 in 1910, and didn't improve on that until 1924. Freddie Brown (74 in March 1933; 79 in January 1951) might have the overall record.
What about guys whose career was interrupted by WWII?