Australia v New Zealand, first Test: David Warner century marks milestone of maturityif warner tons up, get ready for a bunch of rubbish about "maturity"
they're not.Can someone tell me why Boult and Southee are so down on pace....seems like everyone just keeps ignoring that issue
1st Test: Australia v New Zealand at Brisbane, Nov 8-12, 2001 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN CricinfoMake up your mind ffs
My view is that they are 135-140 bowlersCan someone tell me why Boult and Southee are so down on pace....seems like everyone just keeps ignoring that issue
Umm they very clearly are. OK maybe not southee not so much but definitely boult.they're not.
Yeah Boult and Southee are both 135 kmh bowlers in tests. They tend to bowl quicker in ODI's because they only have to get through 10 overs in a day as opposed to 20+ in tests. Same reason why Mitch Starc whips it down at 150 kmh in ODI's but tends to operate in the low-mid 140's in tests.Can someone tell me why Boult and Southee are so down on pace....seems like everyone just keeps ignoring that issue
He's always been in the 130-140kph range. Sometimes a bit quicker than that. He wasn't abnormally slow today.Umm they very clearly are. OK maybe not southee not so much but definitely boult.
Nah, Starc is generally very quick but inaccurateYeah Boult and Southee are both 135 kmh bowlers in tests. They tend to bowl quicker in ODI's because they only have to get through 10 overs in a day as opposed to 20+ in tests. Same reason why Mitch Starc whips it down at 150 kmh in ODI's but tends to operate in the low-mid 140's in tests.
That's fair, might have been too harsh. But, that said, I don't agree they're nailed on for 500. Khawaja or Smith goes early tomorrow and you have a very inexperienced and recently collapsy line-up to follow. They're getting 400 and that's great but 500 is a long way off.The series starting at 390-2 would be in keeping with Australia's advantage of playing meaningful FC red and pink-ball cricket while we play a bunch of 2nd XIers on cow dung...but I'm pretty sure that's not where the series starts at all. Once the other side is locked and loaded for 500/600 in the first innings, you're facing immense scoreboard pressure against a pretty strong attack. I'd say it's definitely started. I'm not saying we bowled awfully at all or the series is over, or we're 1-0 down. It's just a long road to hoe to get to Perth on an even keel, and I don't think that's getting too knee-jerky.
I felt like Brisbane was the one we could really win, a bit of bounce but hopefully shape on the first day. We didn't look assertive enough.
You think so? If NZ can get 8 for under 111 they've done sensational but Australia will probably be feeling very confident that the pitch is now great for bowling and that couldn't hurt with almost 500 on the board.That's fair, might have been too harsh. But, that said, I don't agree they're nailed on for 500. Khawaja or Smith goes early tomorrow and you have a very inexperienced and recently collapsy line-up to follow. They're getting 400 and that's great but 500 is a long way off.
U work?i go to work and this happens. man. it almost makes me want to quit my job...