TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I don't think he wasOh god kiwiviktor was being serious.
I don't think he wasOh god kiwiviktor was being serious.
So goodWhy would we want Bevan consuming late innings deliveries when we have Anderson, Ronchi, Santner, Southee to hit out with?
...he was.That makes early Tendulkar look very ahead of his time.
If Tendulkar were around today he probably wouldn't be selected in the current New Zealand side because he's not as good at hitting out as Southee and SantnerConclusions:
- Afridi was a more consistent ODI batsman across his career than Tendulkar, Sangakkara and Ponting
- Sachin Tendulkar refused to adapt and play the game more efficiently over time
Um, Tendulkar's an openerIf Tendulkar were around today he probably wouldn't be selected in the current New Zealand side because he's not as good at hitting out as Southee and Santner
Perhaps you could explain what it is about those graphs that would change my mind?After seeing those graphs you still think Bevan wouldn't make the side?
How do you arrive at this conclusion from the graphs?That Bevan wouldn't be at 74 SR player if he played today
Graphs aside, do you honestly think that Bevan (in his prime) would not be selected in NZ's current ODI team?Perhaps you could explain what it is about those graphs that would change my mind?
If he batted today and could get his SR over 80 I would pick him.Graphs aside, do you honestly think that Bevan (in his prime) would not be selected in NZ's current ODI team?