fredfertang
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Moeen is an absolute star, but his prime talent seems to me to be riding his luck - he won't be able to do that from the top of the order
He will in the UAE.Moeen is an absolute star, but his prime talent seems to me to be riding his luck - he won't be able to do that from the top of the order
Moeen is an absolute star, but his prime talent seems to me to be riding his luck - he won't be able to do that from the top of the order
See - Hafeez, MohammadHe will in the UAE.
Nail. On. The. Head.See - Hafeez, Mohammad
He's hardly likely to do any worse than whoever else we throw in there.Yes could be a horses for courses selection in putting Moeen at the top in the UAE, exploiting that bit of zip with the new ball, but inevitably dropping back down the order for SA where I'm pretty sure he would be tormented by Steyn, Morkel, etc, but of course wouldn't be the first or last opening bat to suffer this in SA.
I would prefer to go with Masood and Shahzad since Hafeez can no longer bowl. But Hafeez's batting in the UAE hasn't been too bad. Although i don't see the point of sticking with him anymore. Might as well give more experience to PEWS's pet hate (Masood)On Hafeez,does anyone see Pakistan dropping him now that he can't bowl?I mean,that did seem part of the deal in having him open,and they may be tempted by what looks a more solid opening pairing in Shehzad and Masood.Hafeez's test batting form in the last 12 months is pretty good though,all being said.
Odd this generally, I like most sane people, don't believe in not picking someone because they've failed in another format. Yet as I didn't think he should be anywhere near the Test team, I'm happy with this now.Yeah Hales blew his chance.
I think, to give the selectors the benefit of the doubt, Hales would only have got in based on his ODI form due to the lack of options. Probably on some thinly vailed loose reasoning that he'd shown at least he has a temperament for International cricket.Odd this generally, I like most sane people, don't believe in not picking someone because they've failed in another format. Yet as I didn't think he should be anywhere near the Test team, I'm happy with this now.
I'm quite glad Roy didn't review that second Starc LBW, despite it starting the one-sided horror of this deciding match, if he'd got a score I could see an equally, hideous in it's wrongness, campaign for him to be England opener.
I think that's what I'd do, the bottom line is there isn't a specialist opener really pushing in county cricket to be given a shot. In fact there doesn't seem to be much pushing in any direction from county cricket at the moment in any department. Traditionally the UAe is a grave yard for fast bowlers, so Broad, Anderson and Stokes as a third seamer to bowl a dozen overs is probably all that's needed. Some logic to taking a left-arm spinner if Ali and Rashid are nailed on picks. Can't see the logic in leaving out Stokes for a specialist batsman as I don't see any specialist batsman currently holding up their hand and showing they are clearly a better bat than he's been this summer. Can't see the wickets suiting Finn at all and although Woods showed bits of potential the bottom line is he took fewer wickets at a higher average than Stokes in The Ashes, so I don't see a strong argument for picking him as a bowler over Stokes. I think the other off-spinners mentioned are all an anything but Ali pick, however some are spinners who don't spin it and the others haven't really made a compelling case. Ali does give the ball a decent rip and seems to be getting in to some kind of bowling form - probably takes him longer to get back a bowling rhythm after injury due to being relatively new to being a serious spinner. Almost by default I'd gojames taylor for england opener
TBF Hales has scored 886 runs @ 52.11 in Div 1 this year and 954 runs @ 50.21 last year. This compares favourably with any top order batsmen, with the exception of Adam Lyth, over the last two years. Anyone they pick at this point will be a massive punt.I think, to give the selectors the benefit of the doubt, Hales would only have got in based on his ODI form due to the lack of options. Probably on some thinly vailed loose reasoning that he'd shown at least he has a temperament for International cricket.
He was possibly being flippant. Anyway I don't think Taylor as opener is a good option. He isn't a long term bet as he's too much of a lbw and knick off candidate against the new ball and has very rarely batted above 4 in the order in first class cricket - and as one of the better players of spin he's better off in the middle order. Bell or even Stokes (if he didn't have to bowl) are better horses for courses openers in that spot as both will struggle to start against spin and prefer pace and a newer ball. It's tough to know how good anyone is against quality spin these days given the lack of it but I'd fancy Taylor to do as well as anyone in the England side bar Root and probably Cook (if selected).I think that's what I'd do, the bottom line is there isn't a specialist opener really pushing in county cricket to be given a shot. In fact there doesn't seem to be much pushing in any direction from county cricket at the moment in any department.