• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pro-Wrestling Thread II

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
True, but the same principle applies I guess. Was the same with the tag team title match earlier on. Where Titus was positioned as the top guy, lel.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
It's certainly not the best thing they could have done here. But, at the same time, it's not been a bad match. In fact there's not been a bad match on the entire card for mine (so far). But there's not been much that's been especially memorable either.
 

Niall

International Coach
It's certainly not the best thing they could have done here. But, at the same time, it's not been a bad match. In fact there's not been a bad match on the entire card for mine (so far). But there's not been much that's been especially memorable either.
Exactly. This could have been a fun PPV if 3 hours, but it just isn't memorable enough to justify the 4 hours.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Exactly. This could have been a fun PPV if 3 hours, but it just isn't memorable enough to justify the 4 hours.
To be fair, if the Undertaker/Lesnar match really delivers, then it could yet justify it.

This Cesaro/Owens feud reminds me a bit of the Jericho/Benoit feud from 2000, inasmuch as it's two young/up and coming guys who are great to watch, and despite not being the top stars are some of the guys you look forward to seeing more than anyone else on the card.
 

Top