GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
Yeah no way should Stokes not go but ideally he wouldn't be batting six. But there are enough other problems with the batting that there aren't really the personnel to move him down.
I'd probably keep the batting as is on the basis that it's hard to see the replacements. Except Lyth, so yeah stick Hales there
This does leave us in a situation spin wise though as surely we will need two so unless you want Root bowling a stupidly high amount (which is not a sensible option) then it seems it leaves us with Ali and Rashid. Means we will bat deep of course but neither give you confidence that you'd want from a frontline spinner.
Harsh on Finn and Wood but reckon Stokes is worth the third seamer slot there, given what he could bring to the side with the bat.
But yeah the problem is we will have three 'all rounders' none of whom are necessarily worth the place on one discipline alone. Fine to have one player like that in the side that you can slot people around, two is problematic as we've seen at times in this series. Three is crazy.
Balance is a huge issue for us. And I don't mean Gary.
I'd probably keep the batting as is on the basis that it's hard to see the replacements. Except Lyth, so yeah stick Hales there
This does leave us in a situation spin wise though as surely we will need two so unless you want Root bowling a stupidly high amount (which is not a sensible option) then it seems it leaves us with Ali and Rashid. Means we will bat deep of course but neither give you confidence that you'd want from a frontline spinner.
Harsh on Finn and Wood but reckon Stokes is worth the third seamer slot there, given what he could bring to the side with the bat.
But yeah the problem is we will have three 'all rounders' none of whom are necessarily worth the place on one discipline alone. Fine to have one player like that in the side that you can slot people around, two is problematic as we've seen at times in this series. Three is crazy.
Balance is a huge issue for us. And I don't mean Gary.