• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** New Zealand in Zimbabwe and South Africa 2015

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
When Mitch was at his best he generated sharp bounce and appreciable swing delivered from very close to the stumps. He also got some handy reverse. I haven't seen much swing from him lately - probably mainly due to the fact that since Bouthee was successfully transferred to ODI's he's been relegated to 1st change most of the time. I don't think he has the skill-set to fill that role long term.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
to be fair, most of them just thought he wasn't ready yet.

In my opinion, if you have a test match defense and a range of #shotsoffbothfeet, you're better off learning the limited overs game at the international level. For a player like Latham, there are no better coaches in NZ than Kane Williamson, Brendon McCullum and Ross Taylor.

Ditto re: Anderson and Neesham. I think Hesson realises this.
Fully agree, there's no better place for developing your game than international cricket. I remember John Wright saying that there's no way he would've become as good as he did if he'd been born in Australia or England because he wouldn't have had guaranteed place in the starting XI in those countries.
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
Fully agree, there's no better place for developing your game than international cricket. I remember John Wright saying that there's no way he would've become as good as he did if he'd been born in Australia or England because he wouldn't have had guaranteed place in the starting XI in those countries.
yeah, but it won't work if you don't have a decent defense that allows you to keep out the good ball, and if you don't already have a reasonable array of strokes. From here Latham will develop in his ability to rotate the strike, and perhaps the ability to manufacture a few shots against good balls. Just like Williamson did. Pretty minor tweaks on the scale of things.

But that won't work with someone like Rutherford with his limited scoring areas; he's better off developing that in domestic cricket.
 

wellAlbidarned

International Coach
When Mitch was at his best he generated sharp bounce and appreciable swing delivered from very close to the stumps. He also got some handy reverse. I haven't seen much swing from him lately - probably mainly due to the fact that since Bouthee was successfully transferred to ODI's he's been relegated to 1st change most of the time. I don't think he has the skill-set to fill that role long term.
Yeah mitch is 100% an opening bowler and death bowler. He's a lousy third seamer because he can't bowl middle overs for ****.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Feel we may be in for a serious towelling tonight. De Villiers was quite scathing after game 1. Needed to take that golden opportunity presented in game 1 when it was there. Don't think the opportunity will be quite so easy this time around.
 
Last edited:

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
Milne i heart you.

Wheeler nice too.

Interesting that Braces is the third seamer rather than opening bowler.
 

Kippax

Cricketer Of The Year


Predictable, predictable. Had a look at the stream earlier though and it was a nice effort. 720p and the rewind function.
 

thundaboult

International Debutant
Get this into perspective.

1rst T20: Amla dismissed by Adam Milne.

2nd T20: Amla dismissed by Adam Milne.

1rst ODI: Amla dismissed by Adam Milne.

2nd ODI: Amla dismissed by....Adam Milne.

Make of it what you will.
 
Last edited:

Top