-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* Fifth Test at the Oval
- Thread starter Furball
- Start date
LegionOfBrad
International Debutant
Stokes is becoming a good swing bowler. Needs to spend some time with Jimmy working on his variations but he is easily the biggest hooper in the team.
Doesn't look like much off the pitch now so in hindsight not a good decision to bowl but you can understand why Cook did it.
Doesn't look like much off the pitch now so in hindsight not a good decision to bowl but you can understand why Cook did it.
TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
How does the umpire not call that on the spot
They obviously don't even try and call no balls these days unless there's a wicket
stupid
They obviously don't even try and call no balls these days unless there's a wicket
stupid
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
LegionOfBrad
International Debutant
Oh for ****s sake.
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Of course he ****ing isn't. No one does. ****ing farce.
Has comedy value though for sure
Flem274*
123/5
goddammit i wanted vogels bread to kick on. i love old people scoring runs and i like making lame vogels bread jokes only people in one country will get before they keep scrolling.
good to see some fight from aussie but when warner and smith are leading the charge it's not as convincing as you'd hope because we know those two are already going to be the best by a distance in the post-ashes side.
honestly just deposit another million bucks in rogers' bank account. the big three takeover for tv revenue or whatever the **** that money law they passed has to count for something. pass a law saying all tv revenue goes to chris rogers if he agrees to play for two more years.
good to see some fight from aussie but when warner and smith are leading the charge it's not as convincing as you'd hope because we know those two are already going to be the best by a distance in the post-ashes side.
honestly just deposit another million bucks in rogers' bank account. the big three takeover for tv revenue or whatever the **** that money law they passed has to count for something. pass a law saying all tv revenue goes to chris rogers if he agrees to play for two more years.
hendrix
Hall of Fame Member
I dunno, I was really surprised with how Finn stepped up on his return and then did it again in the fourth test. Obviously it's a better attack with Anderson, Broad and Finn, but it wasn't England of the last couple of years where you really wondered where they would get the wickets from if Anderson didn't fire and the batsmen refused to give it away.
Basically, a good toss to lose.
social
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Makes you wonder how many are missed
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ok so this bugs me... why do people say nicking off to a short wide delivery like that is a bad shot? The ball deserved to be hit for 4, so why shouldn't the batsman go for it? You can criticize the execution, maybe but it's there to be smashed.
