cpr
International Coach
He was no Quinton Fortune.Djemba-Djemba
Gary Bailey was a Saffie by birth IIRC
---
Edit: He wasn't, just grew up there. Nevermind.
Last edited:
He was no Quinton Fortune.Djemba-Djemba
He's no Ricky Lambert or Dejan Lovren I agree.Pretty damning on Woodward if that's who they're lining up. He's a fairly good player and all, but I think a club of United's stature (+CL football) could be doing better.
De Bruyne will probably/should play on the right.---------Aguero----------
-Sterling--KDB--Silva-
-Fernandinho-Toure--
Not bad that.
Fergie was going to sell him. He was usually right about when players had peaked. Moyes ****ed it up though."Better at 10" isn't the same as saying "Rooney is good".
He should have been sold 3 years ago. Spud-headed ****.
Move KDB to the right and you've got it.---------Aguero----------
-Sterling--KDB--Silva-
-Fernandinho-Toure--
Not bad that.
By all accounts he habitually loses the dressing-room by late 2nd/early 3rd season. Never did tweak his philosophy to not be a ****.Anyone fancy a sweepstake on when van Gaal gets sacked/walks out on Man Utd?
I'm going for March before the board realise they've been trolled by the fruitcake.
He wouldn't though.The overpaid granny-shagger would moonwalk into any Premier League side.
Nuh-uh. Could start on the right for City, number 10 for Chelsea and centre-back at Arsenal.He wouldn't though.
Don't understand why you would reply with this. Because Man U aren't going to offer Rooney to Leicester or Watford, or well anyone, so it's clearly a hypothetical situation. I also said on footballing reasons. His wages are irrelevant. You might as well mention that he wouldn't want to sign for any other club in the Prem, save maybe City, Chelsea (both of whom I named as 'except for...') and Everton.Not on his wages. Anyone 2011/12 is pretty irrelevant. You know who were even better then? RVP and Falcao.
Debatable. He'd want to play forward or behind the forward. I think we have as good or better options, younger and less costly. It's not like he'd agree to sit on the bench.Whether he'd be an automatic starter or not, anyone other than Chelsea or City would take him if offered. On footballing reasons anyway. Liverpool would possibly fear a fan backlash, then sign him anyway.
I'd have said it's more of a John Barnes type of situation. You look at the media coverage and think, ****ing hell, how can't they see how few clothes the emperor has on?Don't understand why you would reply with this. Because Man U aren't going to offer Rooney to Leicester or Watford, or well anyone, so it's clearly a hypothetical situation. I also said on footballing reasons. His wages are irrelevant. You might as well mention that he wouldn't want to sign for any other club in the Prem, save maybe City, Chelsea (both of whom I named as 'except for...') and Everton.
As a footballer, there are seventeen clubs in the Premier League whose squads would benefit from having him.
I'd also dispute he's been crap since 2012. Pretty sure this same discussion happens every year when he has a few bad games, and then he has a lot of very good ones.
I mean he'a a bluenosed manc piece of **** so what do I care, but he's definitely getting the Gerrard treatment, now old Stevie G has departed the Prem.
Not in the absolute top echelon, but been a very good player for club & country for a very long time, and is 29 not 33. Granted, his 29 is a bit older in footballing terms than most given he debuted young, but to suggest he's finished is laughable. IMHO
Yeah but again, whether or not he'd start, you'd definitely take him into your squad. As I say this is hypothetical so him sitting on the bench or what is irrelevant.Debatable. He'd want to play forward or behind the forward. I think we have as good or better options, younger and less costly. It's not like he'd agree to sit on the bench.
I actually really rate Rooney and tend to think he's still gonna do well at United; but it is coming to the point where you do start to doubt if he gets his **** together consistently enough to want to build a team around him. In the last few seasons he's tended to blow really hot and cold which is probably why he ends up with a decent scoring/assist record but leaves a lingering feeling that he didn't contribute enough in many games.
Expect him to now have a 20+ league goal scoring record
Well fair enough, and obviously you watch him play more than I do. Though the media coverage seems to match the perception in here as far as I can tell, but take your point nonetheless.I'd have said it's more of a John Barnes type of situation. You look at the media coverage and think, ****ing hell, how can't they see how few clothes the emperor has on?
The fact that he's always gone through peaks and troughs shouldn't mask a more general decline. With each passing season his worst becomes worse and his best becomes less impressive.
I think almost all strikers are well past their peak at 29. Would argue they tend to peak at around 24. Of the strikers I mentioned above, Falcao is 29 now, Torres joined Chelsea at 26, Shevchenko joined Chelsea at 28, Owen joined Newcastle at 25, Collymore left Liverpool at 26. Berbatov is the only one who arguably had a peak at around 29, even then I would argue he peaked at Spurs or Leverkusen. You get some strikers still playing well at the top level at 29, but they're the exception.