Pity you haven't converted someone into a decent pacer since Vaas.On Jadeja, I think his role was not defined in test matches. If SL had a player like him he would play at #7. The issue I see with Indian cricket is that coaches fail to recognize players abilities and fail to give a role in the team for them. SL is pretty behind India in talent but we know how to identify roles for each player. That's how we converted off spinner in to batsman who averaged 45+ in test matches (Samaraweera), and a two middle order keeper batsmen in to a openers (Dilshan and Kaushal Silva), and left arm spinner in to a ATG ODI player (Jayasuriya). Everybody has their roles defined.
If Jadeja had a role defined and he kept playing according to it, now he would have hit gold for India.
Pacers has to have pace. You can't change Chris Martin in to Sangakkara, nor Syed Rasel in to Brett Schultz. This is about working with what you have.Pity you haven't converted someone into a decent pacer since Vaas.
Perhaps one reason India have not done the "identifying and converting" when it comes to batting is because of the options available. You already have a KL Rahul, Rohit Sharma, Kedhar Jadhav and others knocking on the door, you don't feel the need to convert Jadeja into a middle order batsman.Pacers has to have pace. You can't change Chris Martin in to Sangakkara, nor Syed Rasel in to Brett Schultz. This is about working with what you have.
On teh side note we have carved few decent pacers off the soft ball league (Nuwan Pradeep and Shaminda Eranga)
Best after them are Rishi Dhawan and Parvez Rasool. They are not better than the above 3 you have mentioned.Somehow refuse to believe there is no fringe all rounder who can be given a go to play at 6/7 and carry fifth bowler's burden other than jadeja/bunny/axar. Ranji circuit can't be this void or is it?
Uncertain. May turn out to be not good enough.Let's not go down that route hey. Ashwin, Mishra, Bhuvi will be fine at 7-9 imo. Saha needs to start delivering now. He has what is required. He now needs to prove to himself and the world that he can score test centuries once in a while.
Yes, it is silly. Drop Harby and pick Pujara, simple.It seems a little perverse to me that when India had a keeper who could reasonably have batted at 6, as well as Jadeja and Ashwin at 7 and 8, and Kumar at 9, they pretty much always went in with 6 batsmen and 4 bowlers. (This is right isn't it? That was certainly my perception...) Now they have a keeper who seems unlikely to be a genuine number 6, and no allrounder beyond Ashwin, and they decide to go with the 5 bowler thing...