• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in Sri Lanka 2015

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Five bowlers may have actually worked for the Indian side- they took 20 wickets in this game. Had it not been for the fifth bowler, they'd be way out of contention, chasing a 300+ total. At least here, we know clearly that Harbhajan and Ishant are not up to the mark. Harbhajan has had enough chances, not been among the wickets, and no more excuses for Ishant's free ride in the Test XI exist- even if he builds a partnership with Dhawan and the next bloke. That he played ahead of Umesh Yadav is baffling.
 

Contra

Cricketer Of The Year
Five bowlers may have actually worked for the Indian side- they took 20 wickets in this game. Had it not been for the fifth bowler, they'd be way out of contention, chasing a 300+ total. At least here, we know clearly that Harbhajan and Ishant are not up to the mark. Harbhajan has had enough chances, not been among the wickets, and no more excuses for Ishant's free ride in the Test XI exist- even if he builds a partnership with Dhawan and the next bloke. That he played ahead of Umesh Yadav is baffling.
1) Harby's played literally 2 tests (Bangladesh and this one), how is that enough chances?
2) Ishant took 38 wickets @ 31 in 2014, WTF IS WRONG WITH U!
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'm pretty convinced Arjun doesn't actually watch any of our tests. Any talk of dropping Ishant now is ridiculous. He's been honest to god not terrible for a while now, which for an Indian fast bowler is gold-standard. And he's been very good this test, especially the first innings (I admittedly didn't watch the second).
 

smash84

The Tiger King
As much as I hate Ishant and want him to do badly so he could earn more flak but he's definitely been a role model of consistency during the last year and a half (by Ishant standards of course)
 

smash84

The Tiger King
can't see India losing this tbh.

You would expect this batting line up to chase down 150 6 days of the week and twice on a sunday
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Never forget THAT 6 to win a series in Pak against Pak.. Anwar crybabying about ball being changed made it all the more lolworthy.. :laugh:
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Anyways SL in the drivers seat given that we have a **** tail that starts at 6 and out of the top 5, one of them is Nohit and the other is Rahane who just seems to hate batting against spinners.. :(
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Anyways SL in the drivers seat given that we have a **** tail that starts at 6 and out of the top 5, one of them is Nohit and the other is Rahane who just seems to hate batting against spinners.. :(
Don't take Gambhiring to a new level.

And Rahane is fine against spinners, although he's more awesome against pace bowlers.
 

CricAddict

International Coach
Anyways SL in the drivers seat given that we have a **** tail that starts at 6 and out of the top 5, one of them is Nohit and the other is Rahane who just seems to hate batting against spinners.. :(
This was how India started the test. India might as well not have played.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
Where's the 5 bowlers bandwagon now? Time and time again we throw away excellent, match winning positions with the ball and allow the opposition back into the match. Our bowlers have their moments when the conditions are in their favour or when the ball's new, but once the opposition begins to make a comeback it's like they just completely **** themselves and run out of ideas.

We might actually end up losing because of the lack of a no. 6 :ph34r:
367 better than 567 is all I got for now.
 

Top