if India don't win from this position well then I don't even know..Still a bit soon to be talking with that sort of arrogance imo.![]()
Well we had NZ 90/5 with 160 needed to avoid an innings defeat.if India don't win from this position well then I don't even know..
yeah on a pitch that just got better and better, and with only 4 bowlers not 5.Well we had NZ 90/5 with 160 needed to avoid an innings defeat.
Watch it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyScnAFq4IYwhere exactly?
Yeah, actually more so Sachin up until 2002 or so. The post gave me quite a bit of pause.You have to be joking. Especially with Lara.
Fat **** Zaheer and Ravindra "darts.com" Jadeja vs Mishra and Ashwin - who even when bowling poorly at least try to take wickets - is quite a difference, too.yeah on a pitch that just got better and better, and with only 4 bowlers not 5.
Nah Zak bowled well in that match, he almost had McCullum out with his knuckle ball a couple of times, would have easily traded Rohit Sharma for Ashwin in that match, which would have been immense for India.Fat **** Zaheer and Ravindra "darts.com" Jadeja vs Mishra and Ashwin - who even when bowling poorly at least try to take wickets - is quite a difference, too.
New Zealanders can tuck into this.Watch it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyScnAFq4IY