King Pietersen
International Captain
Bowling poorly again domestically. Only 7 wickets at 38 in 5 games. Should still be in the One Day squads, but never been a good red-ball bowler. Ridiculous that he played ahead of Rashid in the West Indies.
Surely Root will be the 3rd spinner though so not sure how much a difference that makes?Yeah he is a concern as the 3rd seamer, but I suppose Root gives you more overs in the UAE so that is somewhat lessen the importance of the 3rd seamer.
Depends how many overs of spin we need I guess. I mean it obviously winds up with Stokes at first change which I guess is your primary concern but he won't necessarily be needed for more overs than he is normally anywaySurely Root will be the 3rd spinner though so not sure how much a difference that makes?
I think part of NZ's success against Pak in that test also had to do with Phil Hughes's passing away, Pakistan basically admitted to not being in the mood to play properly, NZ obviously coped with the issue a lot better in terms of a cricketing POV, and of course played better.a big factor in the NZ success in uae was baz. I can't see cook being so successful in taking apart the pak spinners. Baz when in the mood just totally kills the opposition attack
Because if Root can bowl 5-10 overs per day and we have two frontline spinners Stoke's workload won't be much difference. If the pitches turn from Day 1 then he might not even be first change.Surely Root will be the 3rd spinner though so not sure how much a difference that makes?
**** off mccullum wanted to take the team home but they were told to play. get off pakpassion.I think part of NZ's success against Pak in that test also had to do with Phil Hughes's passing away, Pakistan basically admitted to not being in the mood to play properly, NZ obviously coped with the issue a lot better in terms of a cricketing POV, and of course played better.
It is too an extent though,at least when Pakistan resumed their innings on what was the second day,I remember they were 281/3,and I'm not even sure they reached 350.Mark Craig got a 7-for,without ever doing anything extravagant,most of the batsmen just seemed to gift their wickets to him,they didn't seem as if they were in the right mind at all.**** off mccullum wanted to take the team home but they were told to play. get off pakpassion.
Two issues with Ali opening:Yeah so assuming Lyth fails in the second innings, that should be that for him.
Can anybody give me a better option that Ali opening?
Just have a look at how well Hafeez has done in the UAE, why can't Ali have similar sort of success in these conditions?
Might as well go with Hales if Ali is to left field, not sure he is ready to open in test cricket, but **** it everyone else has been tried.
Daryl Mitchell? No thanks.
Buttler is the other big concern at the moment, at times hasn't had a clue against Lyon, needs Mahela to earn his coin as Yasir will own him.
That's just Pakistan being Pakistan. Saying they were too distracted by Hughes' death is a copout.It is too an extent though,at least when Pakistan resumed their innings on what was the second day,I remember they were 281/3,and I'm not even sure they reached 350.Mark Craig got a 7-for,without ever doing anything extravagant,most of the batsmen just seemed to gift their wickets to him,they didn't seem as if they were in the right mind at all.
Poor old Pakistan huh. Could've sworn New Zealand wanted the game called off but were forced to go ahead by Pakistan and it's board. McCullum didn't want to be there, he knew Hughes fairly well, hence the slogging from ball one. Nevermind Kane Williamson, he and Hughes were really good mates. He pretty much begged the management to get him out of the game. I'll never forget him standing there before the start of day two just absolutely bawling his eyes out, poor kid.I think part of NZ's success against Pak in that test also had to do with Phil Hughes's passing away, Pakistan basically admitted to not being in the mood to play properly, NZ obviously coped with the issue a lot better in terms of a cricketing POV, and of course played better.
He will have Rashid who will share spin duties which will massively ease the burden. He batted at the top of the order for Worc and for England in ODI cricket so its not as leftfield as some are suggesting.Two issues with Ali opening:
1. It would confuse his role again. That's crucial given he's still developing as a spinner.
2. If he succeeds, what do you do in South Africa?
I'd go Taylor over Ballance for the spare batsman role - Taylor plays spin pretty well rather like Root - and has turned his season around in the last month or so after working with Peter Moores.
Bairstow and Buttler cover the wicketkeeping backup scenarios.
Lyth goes because there is no-one else - and I think he has the capacity to succeed just he got a little confused with his approach for the first couple of tests. Tried to follow others in the team and be positive when he has made most of his runs over the last couple of years being very selective early on and gradually expanding his game as the innings continued.
Another spinner to go with Ali and Rashid, preferably someone who can bowl long spells and reliable. But there is no-one. If they wanted to take Ansari I'd get rid of one of Ali or Rashid but I'd probably wouldn't take Ansari.
Not sure about Ali in general now. He's had a good run and signs of improvement are limited. Bowling has been poor since the world cup and batting is limited by the fact that he is batting 8 - so they obviously don't think that much of it.