• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Which 4 heads would you put on a cricketing Mount Rushmore?

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Population certainly plays a part in his being iconic, after all he does manage to command so much of a fan following. Much like WG Grace being the most recognizable face in the British Empire (read as England and Australia).

Oh he was pretty iconic in that he was the face of cricket in a resurgent India and was admired enough by people like Michael Schumacher and Roger Federer to make special time for him (Schumacher even gifted him a Ferrari). You would see him on everything, from tea stalls, to soap wrappers, to tamarind sheaths, and whatever.
He's not the first cricketer and certainly won't be the last to rub shoulders with other top sportsmen and/or celebrities. Botham & Warne in particular spring to mind.

Heck I know of people I am certain who can't recall the name of any of India's Prime Ministers in the last quarter century but they would recall Tendulkar's name. For many people here (in the SC) the first thing that comes to mind when you think of India is probably Tendulkar. Heck, if that isn't iconic then what is?
I don't like to overuse 'hyperbole', but that sentence in bold leaves me no choice.


BTW, I'm not arguing against Tendulkar being a phenomenal icon in India, just pointing out it really does help in matters of fame when there's 1.25 billion in your country.
 
Last edited:

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'm going to flip it around a bit, Zinzan. I sense the Sachin thing is going around in circles. Why in your opinion, does Sobers deserve to be in the 4? Sure, he's a greater cricketer, but in terms of simply being iconic, why do you think he surpasses Tendulkar?
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
BTW, I'm not arguing against Tendulkar being a phenomenal icon in India, just pointing out it really does help in matters of fame when there's 1.25 billion in your country.
but the population thing is very, very relevant. One of the biggest reasons M. Ali was so iconic was because he was Ameircan, black and represented the fact that black men could be the best at their field in a field as incredibly popular as boxing at the time. If he wasn't American or black or was at the top of a field less prominent than than boxing or wasn't born at that particular time when racial tensions were high etc., he wouldn't be as important a cultural symbol though he'd be as awesome a boxer.

To determine if someone is iconic, fortune, circumstances etc. obviously come into play. You can't wash them away.
 
Last edited:

smash84

The Tiger King
I don't like to overuse 'hyperbole', but that sentence in bold leaves me no choice.


BTW, I'm not arguing against Tendulkar being a phenomenal icon in India, just pointing out it really does help in matters of fame when there's 1.25 billion in your country.
Why do you think its hyperbole? You probably haven't moved out of your bubble if you think its just hyperbole. I actually know a few people like that.

And last I checked Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka are NOT India.

He's not the first cricketer and certainly won't be the last to rub shoulders with other top sportsmen and/or celebrities. Botham & Warne in particular spring to mind.
.
I don't remember Warne or Botham being gifted a freaking Ferrari
 

Compton

International Debutant
sobers 6 sixes in one over set the platform for modern batting
Did it? He hit the six sixes in 1968. Batting in a limited overs game didn't really progress beyond 'hit a boundary an over and rotate the strike' until after the introduction of T20.
 
Last edited:

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Smali's point about Grace being as big as he was primarily because he was English is actually very good. Imagine if WG had been from one of the smaller cricketing countries of the time like South Africa. He hardly would've been the iconic figure he actually became. It's similar for Sachin imo. Sure, a big part of what made him that iconic was that he was Indian. I don't see how that somehow goes against his 'iconicness' (someone help pls I need a dictionary). As Teja said, you can't wash away chance and circumstances.

Also, a huge part of why Sachin became such an icon was also that he burst onto the scene as a 16 year old and everyone almost unanimously agreed that he would be special. And by age 25 he was already being called by some as the second best after Bradman. The 'teenage genius' aspect of his story is a big part of his iconic stature.
 
Last edited:

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'm going to flip it around a bit, Zinzan. I sense the Sachin thing is going around in circles. Why in your opinion, does Sobers deserve to be in the 4? Sure, he's a greater cricketer, but in terms of simply being iconic, why do you think he surpasses Tendulkar?
Valid question & given the OP left the criteria open, I'm basing my criteria (rightly or wrongly) from the point of view of a cricket lover/cricket historian.

Given almost every cricket historian I've ever read, who saw Sobers, rates him as one of the best 2 cricketers of all time (some say the greatest ever 'cricketer'), speaks volumes for me. Add to that the fact he was the most multifaceted test cricketer of all-time, which makes him rather unique.

When you consider how much debate there is regarding greatest cricketers, there's only really 2 who are almost unanimously regarded as the greatest ever & that's Bradman & Sobers, after that it comes down to preference between the likes of Marshall, Warne, Hobbs, Hammond, Tendulkar, Imran, Hadlee, Murali etc... so Bradman & Sobers were a lock for me..along with Grandfather Grace.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lets settle this once and for all guys.

The four with the most number of Facebook likes on Cricinfo win
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Why do you think its hyperbole?


You really need to re-read that sentence you typed again.
You probably haven't moved out of your bubble if you think its just hyperbole. I actually know a few people like that.
A 'few' being the operative word, that would actually say Tendulkar is the first thing that came to mind if someone mentioned India in a random conversation.
And last I checked Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka are NOT India.
I never disputed those countries weren't in the SC, not sure what gave you that idea.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Valid question & given the OP left the criteria open, I'm basing my criteria (rightly or wrongly) from the point of view of a cricket lover/cricket historian.

Given almost every cricket historian I've ever read, who saw Sobers, rates him as one of the best 2 cricketers of all time (some say the greatest ever 'cricketer'), speaks volumes for me. Add to that the fact he was the most multifaceted test cricketer of all-time, which makes him rather unique.

When you consider how much debate there is regarding greatest cricketers, there's only really 2 who are almost unanimously regarded as the greatest ever & that's Bradman & Sobers, after that it comes down to preference between the likes of Marshall, Warne, Hobbs, Hammond, Tendulkar, Imran, Hadlee, Murali etc... so Bradman & Sobers were a lock for me..along with Grandfather Grace.
I meant apart from his greatness as a cricketer. If that was your criteria fine, though, not going to argue.

But apart from being the 2nd best cricketers ever, what was it about him that makes him truly more iconic than say a Sachin or hell, his own countryman Viv?
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I meant apart from his greatness as a cricketer. If that was your criteria fine, though, not going to argue.

But apart from being the 2nd best cricketers ever, what was it about him that makes him truly more iconic than say a Sachin or hell, his own countryman Viv?
Haha what? He clearly mentioned that being the 2nd greatest cricketer is why he included Sobers. You can't then go and ask him why he picked him over someone like Sachin or Viv while ignoring the very reason he picked him in the first place..
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Obvs Grace, Bradman, and Sobers are a lock as many have said. The problem is there is no fourth person who rivals these 3. One feels it has to a bowler. The closest candidates for me are:

1) Harold Larwood
2) Shane Warne
3) Dennis Lillee
4) Sydney Barnes
5) Ray Lindwall
 
Last edited:

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I don't remember Warne or Botham being gifted a freaking Ferrari
I don't either, but I wouldn't even try to guess how many free concerts the likes of Eric Clapton and Elton John have done for Beefy over the years (and his many charities).
 

smash84

The Tiger King
You really need to re-read that sentence you typed again.


A 'few' being the operative word, that would actually say Tendulkar is the first thing that came to mind if someone mentioned India in a random conversation.
.
I just went back and looked at what i typed there. Not sure what your point is? :huh:

And secondly, I said there are a few people that I know of who are like that. Its not a stretch to imagine that others like them exist.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Haha what? He clearly mentioned that being the 2nd greatest cricketer is why he included Sobers. You can't then go and ask him why he picked him over someone like Sachin or Viv while ignoring the very reason he picked him in the first place..
I get that obviously and I acknowledged it in the post itself but read the whole conversation ffs. I honestly want to know what the other factors were in Sobers being as admired as he was. Like Grace being a charismatic sob, and an incredible athlete in his youth or Worrell being an inspiration with the way be carried himself and being the first permanent black captain.
 
Last edited:

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I meant apart from his greatness as a cricketer. If that was your criteria fine, though, not going to argue.

But apart from being the 2nd best cricketers ever, what was it about him that makes him truly more iconic than say a Sachin or hell, his own countryman Viv?
Well, I did just spell out my criteria, and being 'iconic' wasn't the be-all and end-all. That said, I do think as 'iconic' as Viv and Sachin both were/are, Sobers was at least their equal in this regard. I'm not basing this on the population of their respective fan-bases either, but by how 'iconic' Sobers was held within the cricketing community. If there's anyone with their nose in front of 'Viv' in terms of being a West Indian icon, it has to be Sobers.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I get that obviously and I acknowledged it in the post itself but read the whole conversation ffs. I honestly want to know what the other factors were in Sobers being as admired as he was. Like Grace being a charismatic sob, and an incredible athlete in his youth or Worrell being an inspiration with the way be carried himself and being the first permanent black captain.
Well, I think you used the word that best describes Sobers' style right there, and that's 'Charismatic', with a capital C. From everything I've read (admittedly the older literature is much more expressive), you couldn't wish to imagine a more charismatic cricketer in terms of the way he played the game than Sobers. They say his fielding at a very fine (to the keeper) leg-slip was out of this world and worth the ticket admission alone. He apparently just had skills that others could only dream of.
 
Last edited:

Top