• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Sreesanth gets life ban

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
This may prove nothing more than the Indian Prosecutors dropped a bollock, or maybe through no fault of their own their case fell apart - I shall reserve judgment on Sreesanth until I've learnt a lot more about this - I'm a great believer in the rule of law and innocent until proven guilty etc, but that doesn't alter the fact that in my experience if it looks like a **** it usually is a ****, and Sreesanth most certainly does
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
i feel the whole innocent until proven guilty is there to stop judges from using the "looks like a ****, is a ****" logic you display in that very same sentence. you can't really have it both ways there
 

karan316

State Vice-Captain
I somehow still have a bit of trust in him. I doubt if he would do that and I don't think there was "clear evidence" against him. He gets into a fixing controversy just weeks after he takes a dig against the BCCI for the way it handled the slapgate and supported Harbhajan. It can be a conspiracy against him which ended up doing more damage to the BCCI.
Vindoo gave banned cricketer Sreesanth a clean chit. "I will say he is 100 per cent not guilty. Supposing I am Sreesanth, If I have to give away 14 runs in an over, I will give away two boundaries in the first two deliveries, only then can 14 runs be scored. But he gave only six runs off his first four deliveries — is there a guarantee that two boundaries will be scored off the last two balls?” he argued
This is what I had said about the fixing controversy when it had happened.

I absolutely hate Sreesanth, the display picture I have kept from months also suggest the same, but I always felt that he might be innocent in this case.

People are so easily brainwashed by the media, did people ever see a clear evidence that proved that Sreesanth or the others named were guilty? Absolutely not.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Sreesanth confessed to spot fixing and then reneged presumably on advice of his lawyers/friends. **** him. No sympathies for him.
 
Last edited:

Top