Julian87
State Captain
Really? 450 is where they should be not long after lunch.Think Clarke will declare early. 450-500
Really? 450 is where they should be not long after lunch.Think Clarke will declare early. 450-500
Did you not see the couple of edges that either bounced or barely reached feet height?It was obviously a batting friendly track but there was bounce, carry, and plenty of swing to be had. There's also the slope to be used.
Not a bad pitch IMO.
Yeah, if I were Clarke I'd not consider declaration before the last hour of the day. The best chance Australia has for winning this is to unleash Johnson and Starc on England's tired batsmen for an hour or so, try and pick up 2 or 3 wickets before the close, and then capitalise on day 3 to gain a huge lead (pretty much the template they set in Adelaide 2013).Really? 450 is where they should be not long after lunch.
agree with the analysis of the pitch but England bowled quite poorly in the first hour of the first session, when the ball was doing a bit and overcast conditions provided at least a little bit of assistance to the bowlersThis pitch had no carry.
There was swing on offer, and Broad managed to extract some movement off the pitch somehow, but by and large the wicket was unthreatening. I didn't catch the first session, but from what I saw England's only poor period with the ball was between the two batsmen tonning up and the second new ball being taken. Couple of looseners, an overthrow, conceded a few runs there they shouldn't have. But overall they were good. And Cook kept trying new things. Smith and Rogers just batted really, really well.
This.If it's that flat, then they'll need some recovery time for their bowling. No use going to 650+, because you might not have time to bat again and give your bowlers a rest.
With the confined Test schedules these days, think it's part of making sure that your bowlers don't break down.
I think there were quite a number of australians moaning about the pitch as well.Inevitably I've noticed more often than not ,people only go "urgggh this pitch..." on CW when it's their country's bowlers looking ineffective. Just wait for two innings to be played, although the pitch might change plenty by the time England get a bat.
He's talking drivelLol @ Smith's quote re: Cook's fields. What a smackdown.
Yeah the guys in Ponting's teams were all super attacking already, and they had the clout to dictate their fields etc.I found Ponting commenting on Cook's captaincy to be quite a strange experience. Because I think they both captain in almost identical manner. It's just that Ponting had McGrath and Warne
I don't know. If England bat badly we will have geniuses like Botham saying how the pitch has deteriorated. In reality I can't see how a good pitch on day one becomes a deteriorated one until at least the 4th day. This pitch lacks true pace and bounce but it is still a lot better than Cardiff. If Johnson and co. can't get England out here, then I'd be worried.Inevitably I've noticed more often than not ,people only go "urgggh this pitch..." on CW when it's their country's bowlers looking ineffective. Just wait for two innings to be played, although the pitch might change plenty by the time England get a bat.
It was also a shot at Bayliss, former NSW coach where Smith plays. It was gold.He's talking drivel
Pontings analysis as an impartial commentator is 1000x better than his captaincyI found Ponting commenting on Cook's captaincy to be quite a strange experience. Because I think they both captain in almost identical manner. It's just that Ponting had McGrath and Warne
Yeah rate Punter's commentary, wish more diversity with the women commentating happened though. Get rid of some of the Boof heads