This is in a scenario that reverses how Seth won the belt, after a long trying fight with Lesnar, Shaemus cashes in but ends up losing to Rollins who capitalises.Not convinced beating Sheamus would do a great deal for Rollins tbh. Nobody gives a crap about Sheamus.
It didn't really make sense at the time, and it certainly doesn't look good right now. Athlai sorta touched on it before in reguards to not wanting too many insta-championship shots, but this was one year that perhaps skipping MITB would have made storylines easily, not that they could have actually done thatThey need Sheamus to just fail a cash in. There's no way that they're putting the belt on him, and no one cares about him holding the case at all.
He was always a peculiar choice. I wonder if MITB as a concept is becoming a little tired.
Cena's best in-ring year by a mile. I respect his genuine attempt to diversify his move set, but I have two major gripes with it.Have seen a lot of articles this week heaping praise on Cena. Have to agree too, he's been awesome this year. Didn't like the decision of Rusev dropping the belt at WM, but it's turned out to be a great decision. The Open Challenge has been superb, and we've seen some of the best matches in years. Has it been Cena's best year to date?
Yeah, this is a good point actually. I wonder this also.They need Sheamus to just fail a cash in. There's no way that they're putting the belt on him, and no one cares about him holding the case at all.
He was always a peculiar choice. I wonder if MITB as a concept is becoming a little tired.