• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* 1st Test at the SWALEC Stadium

Riggins

International Captain
"the worst fifty of all time" is looking more than likely to top score here
wasnt even the worst 50 of the match.

Watson's international career will have ended today. Been a fan of his but I think he has become a little lethargic in the last couple of years. At least he ended the ODIs as a World Cup winner, in which he played played his part. He is one of those guys who should have had a batting average in the low to middle 40s and bowling average around 30. A batting average of 35 and bowling of 33 is pretty decent but he hasn't been a big match winner in the mould of even someone like A Flintoff, who is actually a lesser player than Watson but made more of his career.
A bowling average in the low 30's is a pretty reasonable effort for an all-rounder but yeah - he should have averaged 42-45 with the bat at least.
 
Last edited:

Tangles

International Vice-Captain
If Starc is out and we get Siddle that's a blow. He can bowl tight but not convinced he's a threat at this level anymore. No choice with Cummins as the other option. That was such a ****ty pick.

Can we amputate Siddles legs and donate them to Ryan?
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
If Starc is out and we get Siddle that's a blow. He can bowl tight but not convinced he's a threat at this level anymore. No choice with Cummins as the other option. That was such a ****ty pick.

Can we amputate Siddles legs and donate them to Ryan?
This one might have been the best wicket for Sidds.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Famine or feast though

Definitely a confidence player
Yeah, but he's pretty loose - feet go to the same spot, doesn't really use the back foot much. He's a guy who benefitted from being injured for three years when young, spent them all on the ball machine.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah, but he's pretty loose - feet go to the same spot, doesn't really use the back foot much. He's a guy who benefitted from being injured for three years when young, spent them all on the ball machine.
Speaking of bowlers who can bat, what's the word on Pattinson?
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Healy's attempts at analysis are just so good. Earlier he listed the percentages of deliveries that Broad landed in the "good" "full" and "short" lengths, adding up naturally to 100, and concluded that he was so successful as a bowler because he got every ball to land in these areas.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Healy's attempts at analysis are just so good. Earlier he listed the percentages of deliveries that Broad landed in the "good" "full" and "short" lengths, adding up naturally to 100, and concluded that he was so successful as a bowler because he got every ball to land in these areas.
:laugh:
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Watson isn't really an all-rounder though is he,/all very well talking about averages, but he takes 1.3 wickets a match. He's a batsman that bowls. In Tests anyway.

BTW, England are doing well, but surely they must still be trying to fit Gregory into the side, only makes sense too.
 
Last edited:

Top