Gnske
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
He missed 4 - 6 tests before that year where the mistake of the century in Matthew Wade took over the glovesRad's only played 66 Tests? Dude's been around forever?
He missed 4 - 6 tests before that year where the mistake of the century in Matthew Wade took over the glovesRad's only played 66 Tests? Dude's been around forever?
Same, if the ball had fallen off Haddin then and clipped leg, knocking bails off, no one would have said he shouldn't be given out.Close call. Don't mind it being given out there though.
Oh yeah it was totally reasonable.Extremely hard to get LBWs overturned. Don't see the problem going for the review as they get them back in a few overs.
Yeah, he hasn't really missed many matches. Played well over 2/3 I would imagine.Gilchrist existed until 2008. Plus he had an extended period out due to what happened to his daughter.
Gilchrist existed until 2008. Plus he had an extended period out due to what happened to his daughter.
Right, makes more sense now.He missed 4 - 6 tests before that year where the mistake of the century in Matthew Wade took over the gloves
You're probably used to Healy+Gilchrist playing every Test, while with Rad Wade and Paine have taken some away from him.Rad's only played 66 Tests? Dude's been around forever?
The logic would have centred on what he offered with the ball but you have to wonder about even that considering he barely bowled in the first dig on a pitch he, prima facie, was perfect for.Why isn't Mitch Marsh playing instead of Watto? Is that just an unforgivable boob or is there something I'm missing?
Bowling/experience I think. Which is kinda useless if he only bowls 8 overs, but then again our bowling was pretty poor 1st innings....Why isn't Mitch Marsh playing instead of Watto? Is that just an unforgivable boob or is there something I'm missing?
Bowling, basically.Why isn't Mitch Marsh playing instead of Watto? Is that just an unforgivable boob or is there something I'm missing?
Doesn't Marsh bowl pretty similar stuff?The logic would have centred on what he offered with the ball but you have to wonder about even that considering he barely bowled in the first dig on a pitch he, prima facie, was perfect for.
The bowling wasn't it? Watson likely to go for less runs. If England had made such a decision it would have been lambasted as the same old conservative selection policy.Why isn't Mitch Marsh playing instead of Watto? Is that just an unforgivable boob or is there something I'm missing?
can't forget Manou.You're probably used to Healy+Gilchrist playing every Test, while with Rad Wade and Paine have taken some away from him.
Taller, hits the deck harder, less accurate, doesn't move it as much (no reverse I've seen yet either). Could be good but not there yet.Doesn't Marsh bowl basically the same stuff?
You speak as if no one in Australia have ever lambasted the selectors for continuing to pick watto.The bowling wasn't it? Watson likely to go for less runs. If England had made such a decision it would have been lambasted as the same old conservative selection policy.
Given how poor Watson looked with the ball I can't see a justification, he didn't help keep control at all.Why isn't Mitch Marsh playing instead of Watto? Is that just an unforgivable boob or is there something I'm missing?