Swingpanzee
International Regular
That (I hope), but also to give Clarkey more time I presume.Clarke opening with Rogers? Hope this doesn't mean SMarsh is now a lock?
That (I hope), but also to give Clarkey more time I presume.Clarke opening with Rogers? Hope this doesn't mean SMarsh is now a lock?
Listening to the commentary, he apparently has a "niggle" so was never going to bowl this match. Seriously when is this bloke actually 100% fit? FMDWatson didn't bowl yesterday? What does this mean in the him vs Marsh selection debate?
if Watson's not gonna bowl then just play Marsh. Better batsman and available to get a few overs through. Main thing going for Watson is that his type of bowling suits English conditions more (Marsh's bowling I don't rate that much atm, plus he's a more bang it into the pitch type of bowler) plus he gets starts.Listening to the commentary, he apparently has a "niggle" so was never going to bowl this match. Seriously when is this bloke actually 100% fit? FMD
mitch marsh is likely to pick up two or three wickets tbh. i cant recall the last time watson actually picked up more than a wicket although he could do the run drying up thing better than marsh. guess it would depend on the the rest of the attack as well. if harris is to miss out i would rather have watson as the 5th bowler because starc and johnson both could leak it.if Watson's not gonna bowl then just play Marsh. Better batsman and available to get a few overs through. Main thing going for Watson is that his type of bowling suits English conditions more (Marsh's bowling I don't rate that much atm, plus he's a more bang it into the pitch type of bowler) plus he gets starts.
Next game Starc should get a bowl just to see how he fares vs Harris on the same pitch.
Not exactly test level bowling.Marsh playing himself into the test side here....why does watson always run out of steam after hitting 50