Er how did it not look out in ball tracking?Lucky call, didn't look out in realtime or ball tracking imo
I am not sure about ball tracking, I wish they would continue it to the keeper as I am sure a some of them would be taken on the bounce or at his ankles according to ball tracker.Er how did it not look out in ball tracking?
Pitched outside and going over the top, with barely any of the ball clipping bails.Er how did it not look out in ball tracking?
It was going on to clip the stumps.Pitched outside and going over the top, with barely any of the ball clipping bails.
Had the on-field call been not out, it'd have been ruled not out by a mile and the commentators would be praising the umpire for a great call. Unfortunately for McCullum the on-field call was out and despite the balls only merit being hitting in line he gets an out. Notably the commentators then justify the decision rather than praise it. Hence, lucky. Good for Wood.
lolPitched outside and going over the top, with barely any of the ball clipping bails.
Had the on-field call been not out, it'd have been ruled not out by a mile and the commentators would be praising the umpire for a great call. Unfortunately for McCullum the on-field call was out and despite the balls only merit being hitting in line he gets an out. Notably the commentators then justify the decision rather than praise it. Hence, lucky. Good for Wood.
Don't be silly, you know full well the regulations surrounding drs and umpires call. Had that been England reviewing a not out, it'd still be not out despite "going on to clip the stumps". I'm sorry that fact offends your logicIt was going on to clip the stumps.
If the ball clips the stumps, the bails tend to come off.
Your logic is lacking here.