• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pro-Wrestling Thread II

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Yeah that's not a bad shout actually. By the same measure though, that leaves the main event scene looking a bit sparse. Rollins v Kane is obvs penned in for the next PPV (the next real one anyway), but nobody will care. Maybe after that they can find some filler feud to tie us over until Lesnar shows up again. Boy are they missing him at the moment.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sheamus seems like the really obvious choice for the IC, particularly if they're building towards IC v US. I'm not really sure what to do with Orton. He shouldn't really be hanging around the shield guys, and Rusev/Bray Wyatt don't need Orton around either. I'd almost throw him into the IC if not for, you know, Cena v Orton mk 126. I really do have faith that if Kane breaks from the authority, Rollins-Kane could be a tolerable thing, though. And yeah, as long as he doesn't win everything, HHH coming back could add some spice
 
Last edited:

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
Ambrose/Lesnar for Summerslam IMO. Would work in a Punk/Lesnar 2013-type way. Plus Ambrose is super-over and crazy enough to believably call out Brock.
 

duffer

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah that's not a bad shout actually. By the same measure though, that leaves the main event scene looking a bit sparse. Rollins v Kane is obvs penned in for the next PPV (the next real one anyway), but nobody will care. Maybe after that they can find some filler feud to tie us over until Lesnar shows up again. Boy are they missing him at the moment.
Logic says you're right but oh god it will be a train wreck if they go down that road.
 

duffer

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
So Rusev has now jobbed 3 PPVs straight. A future career as a comedy dancing character beckons...
I groaned when they announced it would be an "I Quit" match. So predictable, don't know where he goes from here especially once he splits from Lana.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Do they have enough time to do Rollins/Kane and still believably build? Also how the **** do they book that without Brock ending up with the belt again?
Yeah, should have thought there would be loads of time. Lesnar's feuds since his return have pretty much all had as little as one month's worth of build. Easily enough time to get a program with Kane done and dusted before setting up Brock coming back in for his quarterly appearance.

As for the second question, I'd guess the answer would be: shenanigans.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
I groaned when they announced it would be an "I Quit" match. So predictable, don't know where he goes from here especially once he splits from Lana.
Yeah, will be interesting to see what he ends up doing on RAW tonight. I imagine he'll just be back to squashing jobbers for a while until they can put him in a feud with a credible face who can absorb a loss.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Four way was awesome
I Quit was okay. I enjoyed it but it borrowed most of its spots from the Cena-Orton 09 series (the best of their feuds I thought)
New Day :wub:
Neville V King Barrett pretty good
Sheamus V Ziggler decent
Bellas you suck.
Bray Wyatt sucks

Brock V Seth needs no build. Entitled to a rematch, needs suspension lifting. That's literally all they need to do.

Also, Sledger is just making it up that Cena V Bryan was inked in for Summerslam. Go and unvote for him.

Decent show over all, doubt I'll ever want to watch it again. Same as most non mania PPVs of late really. Enjoyable in the moment and that's about it.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I dunno...I thought they may possibly go down that route but with the way they've made the US title mean something I suspect they had the aim of doubt the same with the IC to build a stronger midcard.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Yeah, I don't disagree. I just thought they would attempt to do that through a champion vs champion type match at some point.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
turns out they added Rollins-Ambrose and Owens-Cena for EC. I'm not so on board with a Rollins title bout for EC but whatever
 

Top