Nah that Test was over by tea on Day 2, pretty much. Absolute hammering.For some reason I remembered the margin of victory as being smaller
Its a very tough one really and it is where selectors earn their money.I think if you asked them before the series started what they would've done should they find themselves 1-0 down after two Tests with a tiring/injured attack, they would've been reasonably comfortable dropping Samuels or Blackwood for a one-off game to fit in an extra bowler, but given they've both hit tons in the series it's much tougher. The middle order batsmen who were more or less entrencged -- Chanderpaul and Bravo -- have been the ones failing to contribute.
Perhaps Ramdin will open just as a one-off or something.
Yeah that's obviously fine, but if Holder is out they can't go with five bowlers as was being suggested.Their batting should be ok, 6 batsmen and Ramdin should do them.
They need a win, Taylor, Roach, Gabriel, Bishoo should be a decent enough attack. If they don't win it's hardly going to be because their number 8 was pish.
It was but Boult and Southee will be a different proposition this year I reckon.In any case his ton against NZ was mint
Still one more test to pull through for Shiv, would probably be unfair to say his time is nigh but his reflexes seem to be and no doubt are waning. Which is unfortunate for a man so busy in his technique.This I can't really comment on today, though England clearly completely outplayed us today. Can't believe shiv failed again, I'm getting seriously worried.
They were really good back then tbf. Were brilliant at Lords in reasonably helpful conditions. Headingley was flat and sunny though.