Not really. Tyalor especially (dunnout about Elliott too) is poor against spin early. Good idea to bowl two spinners in tandem.Clarke is missing a trick by not going for the kill here. This is not the correct time to bowl Faulkner and Maxwell from 2 ends.
that still looks dodgy.he was miles down the deck
Lel**** you Dharmasena.. ashamed to be Sri Lankan atm.
You are supposed to support the underdog you ****ing moron.
**** you Dharmasena.. ashamed to be Sri Lankan atm.
You are supposed to support the underdog you ****ing moron.
this is a bad (TM) post**** you Dharmasena.. ashamed to be Sri Lankan atm.
You are supposed to support the underdog you ****ing moron.
Look where haddin ended up his gloves was past leg stump when it hit elliot BIG CLUEhawk eye sucks. no way was that travelling so far down leg. no way.
The fact that Haddin ended up outside leg after the shot was a giveaway too.he was miles down the deck
It's because the replay camera is from a different angle.looked strange live, then on replay dead, then turns out live was a better phlegm call
yea right none of you thought it was out.HawkEye > artvandalay watching on TV.
Elliott's really good against spin in Aus/SA/Eng/NZ conditions; just rotates the strike. He always looks horrible in Asia though.Not really. Tyalor especially (dunnout about Elliott too) is poor against spin early. Good idea to bowl two spinners in tandem.
Didn't expect it to be that far down legside, thought it might have clipped and been given but was surprised it was so far wide.
Think about the fact that the cameras aren't straight behind the wicket.that still looks dodgy.
yeah. can't really see how anyone could complain about that decision but hey-hoThe fact that Haddin ended up outside leg after the shot was a giveaway too.
Yeah but it would have only clipped the outside of a 4th stump, Was a lot wider than anyone would have expected in the end.The fact that Haddin ended up outside leg after the shot was a giveaway too.