Final - New Zealand v Australia (29th March)

[OverratedSanity]

OMG Sachin vs Ajmal

 

[Mike5181]

lol what a **** decision.

 

[biased indian]

missing leg

 

[Athlai]

Best world.

 

[Spikey]

Furball proven wrong again #legstumpdoesntexist

 

[smash84]

oh no

 

[hendrix]

Man that's a poor decision review it

o rly

 

[Spark]

haha, fair enough

 

[Pothas]

Haha not even close.

 

[OverratedSanity]

tbf if his logic is "Boult played a blinder", then it's not really Gambler's Fallacy, as such.

Yes it is.

 

[NUFAN]

15 more overs of the quicks
15 overs from forkers, maxwell and watto.

 

[artvandalay]

hawk eye sucks. no way was that travelling so far down leg. no way.

 

[Tangles]

Looked too far down live and it was but I frequently get surprised these days.

 

[Spark]

**** shot though. why would you sweep on that line

 

[hendrix]

gee the umpire was sucked in by that appeal, btw.

Was genuine umpire choking.

 

[Spark]

hawk eye sucks. no way was that travelling so far down leg. no way.

he was miles down the deck

 

[weldone]

Clarke is missing a trick by not going for the kill here. This is not the correct time to bowl Faulkner and Maxwell from 2 ends.

Edit: Ok, Starc's on now.

 

[OverratedSanity]

tbf if his logic is "Boult played a blinder", then it's not really Gambler's Fallacy, as such.

Yeah it is

 

[Prince EWS]

tbf if his logic is "Boult played a blinder", then it's not really Gambler's Fallacy, as such.

Yeah, depends. If his logic is "it was an anomaly, was unlikely to happen then and is still just as unlikely to happen now" then that's fine. If it was "he won't do it twice in a row" then it's completely faulty though because he doesn't have to do it twice in a row from here.

 

[anil1405]

Satrc's 2-3 overs now are huge in the context of the game.