Red
The normal awards that everyone else has
Hardly.Gilchrist over Dhoni in ODIs is a joke tbh.
Hardly.Gilchrist over Dhoni in ODIs is a joke tbh.
They both shouldn't be in the top 5, but Gilchrist especially. Murali and one of McGrath or AB should be in the top 5.Hardly.
Gilchrist is by no means out of place in the top 5, and neither is Dhoni. Gilchrist was a completely devastating opener as well as a very good keeper. Gilchrist's strike rate at the top of the order was incredible, and he was completely unselfish in regards to playing for red ink. As keepers who can bat top six they make an ODI team very formidable.They both shouldn't be in the top 5, but Gilchrist especially. Murali and one of McGrath or AB should be in the top 5.
He wasn't that groundbreaking though. He basically was Jayasuriya with gloves (with a lower chance of tonning up than Jayasuriya even though he averaged a bit higher). Dhoni you could say redefined finishing.Gilchrist is by no means out of place in the top 5, and neither is Dhoni. Gilchrist was a completely devastating opener as well as a very good keeper. Gilchrist's strike rate at the top of the order was incredible, and he was completely unselfish in regards to playing for red ink. As keepers who can bat top six they make an ODI team very formidable.
There's a good argument that he's already the GOAT ODI batsman imo. If he wins it for SA this WC it will be solidified.ab needs to do more i reckon to be counted in an AT world XI, yet
I didn't say he was groundbreaking.He wasn't that groundbreaking though. He basically was Jayasuriya with gloves (with a lower chance of tonning up than Jayasuriya even though he averaged a bit higher). Dhoni you could say redefined finishing.
Murali was undoubtedly the best ever bowler in the middle overs, McGrath was probably the best ever new ball bowler. And AB is.. well he's AB.
Every single other top 5 option is groundbreaking. Gilchrist was just very good. top 25 imo.I didn't say he was groundbreaking.
That was 2002 though.. I think Murali and Pollock would feature if it was done now.Remember when Wisden put out a list on the greatest ODI bowlers in 2002. It was Wasim, Donald, Waqar, McGrath, and Garner as the top 5.
I was surprised he wasn't in the top 5 too.Bevan?!
Tendulkar has an absolutely enormous margin over other openers as well, in terms of both average and strike rate, and that's before you factor in how long he sustained that type of performance.I guess margin over peers would be a big factor. Average over 47 and SR of 90 in 70s and 80s is ridiculous. Its excellent even by today's standards
Difficult question to answer because it was kind of mixed up & all over the shop. They played 60 over cricket in England well into the 80s, so the first 3 world cups there were all 60 overs, even 1983 in spite of the fact NZ, Australia & the rest of the world were playing 50 over cricket from the early 80s.Just out of curiosity for long was ODI cricket 60 overs before they changed it to 50?