Definitely - the two worked well together against Pakistan a couple of weeks back, and Southee definitely has more obvious qualities as a first change/later innings bowler. But I still reckon that it'll be a repeat of Southee, Boult, Milne for Friday.If that was the case, is there an argument for Mills & Boult to take the new ball with Southee first-drop?
Why not? If he's a serious contender then he'll have to do it at the end of the competition, so NZ might as well give him a test run now.There is no way Milne is playing three in a row. Mills? Or Mitch to troll the English out?
No problem with playing three new ball bowlers with a new ball at either end. If you rotate early, the first change will get a ball that is three overs old.
You don't give a bloke who has a history of injuries three consecutive games when there are so many games remaining and there are very good bowlers as back-up.Why not? If he's a serious contender then he'll have to do it at the end of the competition, so NZ might as well give him a test run now.
If Milne can't get through three games in a row, then there's no point in selecting him in the first place. If necessary, he can be rested for the Bangladesh game at the end of pool play (the Hamilton surface is unlikely to suit him anyway).You don't give a bloke who has a history of injuries three consecutive games when there are so many games remaining and there are very good bowlers as back-up.
Yeah, the biggest concern from an NZ pov is how little exposure NZ have had to quality pace bowling in the last 12 months. There's a real risk that the top order could come apart if England bowl well. Still, New Zealand have a strong record at the Stadium (I think only SA have beaten us there in ODI's in the last 10 years).Looking forward to this one immensely. Broad and Anderson will obviously be crucial for England if there's anything through the air or off the deck. Bell with the bat is clearly the key bloke (which pretty much tells you how bad they're going, but still). He's technically correct and solid enough to bat through in NZ conditions. Reckon this might be pretty close tbh.
I recall Kulasekara acting like he won the world cup there?Yeah, the biggest concern from an NZ pov is how little exposure NZ have had to quality pace bowling in the last 12 months. There's a real risk that the top order could come apart if England bowl well. Still, New Zealand have a strong record at the Stadium (I think only SA have beaten us there in ODI's in the last 10 years).
Only need to bowl Mills out by the 42nd or be prepared to share a few of and Corey's overs with Elliott/Williamson.I think the fact that Anderson is seen as a legitimate death option means Mills could definitely play as a specialist middle overs bowler if you were that way inclined. It'd require Mills to be fit enough to get through heaps of his overs is a pretty short period but he was completely bowled out by the 30th in a game recently so I don't think it's unworkable.
Yeah me too; hence suggesting Mills as a specialist middle overs bowler. The opening combo doesn't necessarily have to be changed for MIlls to play. I'd definitely rather Mills play a middle overs role than McClenaghan but the latter always proves me wrong tbf.But I think we should stick with Southee/Boult as the new ball pair.
McClenaghan's taken 15 wickets in 5 ODIs against England. He'd be my third seamer in Wgtn.Yeah me too; hence suggesting Mills as a specialist middle overs bowler. The opening combo doesn't necessarily have to be changed for MIlls to play. I'd definitely rather Mills play a middle overs role than McClenaghan but the latter always proves me wrong tbf.