Are tons really that impressive in this era?

[cnerd123]

Sure, like I say, WW makes just as many **** calls as you guys do. :P

As many as we all do combined tbh.

Nationalistic BS aside, he just makes himself impossible to hold any sort of reasonable debate with. It's all part of his charm I suppose. Keeps the forum lively.

 

[WindieWeathers]

Wow this thread gets better and better every hour. ATG quality. We should have a Best of WW and Blocky thread which compiles all their great moments into one big beautiful pile.

Says the guy who, along with two other posters was trying to mock me on pages 9, 10 and 11? yeah ok .

 

[OverratedSanity]

What about the one where Indian cricketers discredit their ATG batsman of the past in order to make their current stars look better?

What in the......

 

[cnerd123]

What in the......

Hey, I'll have you know that I have played more FC games than Sanju Samson and have taken more wickets than Karn Sharma.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Says the guy who, along with two other posters was trying to mock me on pages 9, 10 and 11? yeah ok .

Look WW, I never mocked you personally. I disagreed with your posts vehemently and found they made me laugh. I mocked your posts and your style of posting, yes. I did not in any way shape or form mock you as a person. If I've done that, point it out. I'll apologize.

 

[cnerd123]

Says the guy who, along with two other posters was trying to mock me on pages 9, 10 and 11? yeah ok .

More like all the pages tbh.

You're trying hard but the constant errors are undermining your argument.

 

[Blocky]

As many as we all do combined tbh.

Nationalistic BS aside, he just makes himself impossible to hold any sort of reasonable debate with. It's all part of his charm I suppose. Keeps the forum lively.

I have debates with him, we debated West Indies vs New Zealand during the series and he took great offense at me saying that it would be disgraceful if NZ lost to the West Indian team.... it lasted about five minutes and we moved on to the next cricket discussion. If you notice, he'll talk cricket until someone makes a statement about him personally, i.e "you're a banal poster" or "that's a **** post". If you talk cricket to him and don't insult him, he's fine. Calling him a troll because he happens to snap back at people who insult him and then refuse to engage with them just seems a bit rich.

 

[cnerd123]

I have debates with him, we debated West Indies vs New Zealand during the series and he took great offense at me saying that it would be disgraceful if NZ lost to the West Indian team.... it lasted about five minutes and we moved on to the next cricket discussion. If you notice, he'll talk cricket until someone makes a statement about him personally, i.e "you're a banal poster" or "that's a **** post". If you talk cricket to him and don't insult him, he's fine. Calling him a troll because he happens to snap back at people who insult him and then refuse to engage with them just seems a bit rich.

Really is double standards then isn't it? He disrespects people's viewpoints and posting all the time (again; look at his attitude to Noah) and expects to have his opinions and style of posting be treated with respect in return?

 

[WindieWeathers]

Sure, like I say, WW makes just as many **** calls as you guys do. :P

That poster, who i rarely engage with now simply because i believe he's desperate to get me banned...focuses more on ME than he does the debates...it's obsession personified and the fact that i usually ignore him clearly doesn't sit well in his mind.

Now he's even trying to send me silly messages via pm!!..but still those efforts remain futile.

 

[Blocky]

Really is double standards then isn't it? He disrespects people's viewpoints and posting all the time (again; look at his attitude to Noah) and expects to have his opinions and style of posting be treated with respect in return?

The difference is, he disrespects your cricketing opinion, not your personality. He also isn't following people from thread to thread looking to pick fights constantly like people do to him.

Anyway, this thread is both boring and also contains a high risk of me being banned due to how many people I decided to argue with over the course of the day in it... so I'm out.

 

[OverratedSanity]

The difference is, he disrespects your cricketing opinion, not your personality. He also isn't following people from thread to thread looking to pick fights constantly like people do to him.

Yet all I've done in this thread is laugh at some of the posts (not his personality) and point out what I perceive are baffling flaws in logic in your and his posts. Am I not allowed to do that? Because you seem to get annoyed when I do.

 

[WindieWeathers]

Look WW, I never mocked you personally. I disagreed with your posts vehemently and found they made me laugh. I mocked your posts and your style of posting, yes. I did not in any way shape or form mock you as a person. If I've done that, point it out. I'll apologize.

That took the debate to a lower level and then you turn around and start complaining about how the thread is now? to me you're sounding like a hypocrite.

 

[Jono]

Weird thread

 

[Howsie]

You are picking a fight against a point literally no one has said

Um, it's Blocky.

But damn what a thread, reminds me of the old GP forum days.

 

[cnerd123]

That poster, who i rarely engage with now simply because i believe he's desperate to get me banned...focuses more on ME than he does the debates...it's obsession personified and the fact that i usually ignore him clearly doesn't sit well in his mind.

Now he's even trying to send me silly messages via pm!!..but still those efforts remain futile.

Keeps me up all night mate.

I admit I get some pleasure from constantly picking on all of your mistakes, but I don't go to threads 'seeking fights'.

Really it isn't our fault if you can't handle a group of people laughing at a silly idea or opinion you have, or mocking your posting. You are fully entitled to post what you like, we are fully entitled to make fun of it.

IF instead you actually engaged in debates properly, respected other posters a bit more, and could admit when you are proven wrong...people would stop 'ganging up' on you.

Or, you know, just keep doing what you are doing. I genuinely enjoy it.

 

[OverratedSanity]

That took the debate to a lower level and then you turn around and start complaining about how the thread is now? to me you're sounding like a hypocrite.

But where did I mock you personally? I want to apologize. Just give me the opportunity by pointing out the offensive post.

 

[Spark]

Think this one has run its course.