Cevno
Hall of Fame Member
Depends on instance to instance tho. Sometimes technology cannot catch something for sure or causes slight doubt either way. But I'd say atleast 9 out 10 times this one would have overturned.Nah, disagree. The way DRS works with the "There has to be 190% proof that the on field umpire was a fool" results in the third umpire generally not reversing decisions like those even if it's clear that it's not out. Ends up making both on field and third umpire look like nincompoops.
Tough to see what doubt could be there.