BackFootPunch
International 12th Man
Yeah that's an interesting question actually. He was a prodigy in some ways because no one scored as many runs as him, looked as good or was as hard to get out. But, on the other hand, you never felt completely dominated. You could still get him out with a good nut in a decent area. He was just an awesome accumulator of runs and did it really regularly. Much like how he's batted in these games. Not too many risks, good shots all round the wicket and you really had to earn his wicket. You'd be battling away against him then he'd have 50, then 100 and you didn't remember ever feeling helpless. I think that's what made Williamson such a freak. Guys just couldn't even contemplate how to get him out.I have a question for you, good to see you in the thread btw, you have said that Latham was always the big wicket of school boy cricket. Was he a prodigy in the sense Taylor was...not bringing Kane into it as I don't think anyone has ever done as well as him in youth cricket.
Where I am going with this is - is I am wondering if we have three prodigies in the team now.
Of the other guys in the side I've played against, Neesham and Anderson were a bit like that too. I didn't play Anderson too much but you can see how demoralising he could have been to a bowling attack. Neesham likewise. He'd just ****ing destroy you no matter where you bowled. Except they didn't have the consistency of Latham or Williamson.