What, their top order that still have about 1100 runs for the loss of 12 wickets in three innings?... ? Let's do that comparison now.
Well I said it a few pages ago, let's agree that Sodhi bowled well for Sodhi and leave it there. Let's also agree Craig should be dropped, Wagner should play the next test and we need to figure out who out of Anderson/Neesham we're going to play, because Anderson isn't a #5's bollocks.
Unlikely, it's a tour thread. Whenever Sodhi bowls or at the end of the day we'll discuss how he bowled. The passion of the "sides" is a relatively new thing.
I guess so. But it's been pedantic. He bowled well. 46 runs per wicket. He kept the rums down which could avoid defeat in the end. But he got hit for a couple of fours by Tailenders. But he bowled well. Averaged 46....etc.
Boult was bowling beautifully till the ball was about 35 overs old. Getting a hint of reverse too.
i was talking this match alone but whatever, you have to look at the whole team performance anyway, so its not as if you can conclude anything meaningful
Anderson has played better than Neesham in one innings of batting and one innings of bowling, the reality is though that you can't pick both - one of them has two test centuries and has scored more runs in five matches than the other has in eight. Go figure. "Neesh an extended run" - the guy still averages 50 with the bat, mate.
Pretending he's not is worse.
About a day ago you commented that Anderson had put the work in and looked the better of the two. The definition of i know more than you, so arguing for the sake of arguing posting.
As a bowler, in one innings. And in this innings, Neesham was far more effective, go figure. Like I said, you pick one or the other, you can't play both. I'm not saying Neesham absolutely over Andreson but I will say Neesham is more likely in two years to be a test player than Anderson is.
Well, that's probably due to the fact that there are three or four regular NZ posters at the moment sitting out with a ban.
Right, so he's a no-hoper since he bowled some unplayable deliveries in between going for a little over 2 runs an over. Fair enough. All our attack are no-hopers, then.
I think he is just like this in general.
Ie, you think Boult should be dropped
If someone is to be dropped it will be Boult over Craig. Sodhi having outbowled craig in the previous match
So you want Wagner in the team infront on Boult, with Craig and Sodhi being ahead of Craig.
You sir, are an idiot.
"Bowled some unplayable deliveries" - He's got Azhar out a few times, outside of that? What was unplayable? All I saw was a #11 dispatching him to the boundary and the tail end having no problem at all batting against him.
